BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094989)

  • 1. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theories of intelligence influence self-regulated study choices and learning.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 31282727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feeling of knowing and restudy choices.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Cockcroft-McKay C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
    Toppino TC; Cohen MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1480-91. PubMed ID: 20822306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):743-9. PubMed ID: 22585362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes.
    Miller TM; Geraci L
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
    Cohen MS; Yan VX; Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1682-96. PubMed ID: 23565792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
    Little JL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning.
    Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence.
    Minear M; Coane JH; Boland SC; Cooney LH; Albat M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1474-1486. PubMed ID: 29648873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.
    Yan VX; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):918-33. PubMed ID: 27227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.
    Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing.
    Kornell N; Son LK
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 19468957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.