These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094989)

  • 1. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theories of intelligence influence self-regulated study choices and learning.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 31282727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
    Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feeling of knowing and restudy choices.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Cockcroft-McKay C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
    Toppino TC; Cohen MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1480-91. PubMed ID: 20822306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):743-9. PubMed ID: 22585362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
    Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes.
    Miller TM; Geraci L
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
    Cohen MS; Yan VX; Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1682-96. PubMed ID: 23565792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
    Little JL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Critical Importance of Retrieval--and Spacing--for Learning.
    Soderstrom NC; Kerr TK; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Feb; 27(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 26674128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence.
    Minear M; Coane JH; Boland SC; Cooney LH; Albat M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1474-1486. PubMed ID: 29648873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the difficulty of mending metacognitive illusions: A priori theories, fluency effects, and misattributions of the interleaving benefit.
    Yan VX; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jul; 145(7):918-33. PubMed ID: 27227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.
    Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing.
    Kornell N; Son LK
    Memory; 2009 Jul; 17(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 19468957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.