These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094989)

  • 21. Test Experience, Direct Instruction, and Their Combination Promote Accurate Beliefs about the Testing Effect.
    Rivers ML
    J Intell; 2023 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 37504790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metacognitive awareness of the pretesting effect improves with self-regulation support.
    Pan SC; Rivers ML
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1461-1480. PubMed ID: 36637644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age-related differences in effectiveness of item restudy choices: the role of value.
    Li P; Zhang Y; Li W; Li X
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jan; 25(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 27938313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Metacognitive control and the spacing effect.
    Son LK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):255-62. PubMed ID: 20053063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dividing attention impairs metacognitive control more than monitoring.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2064-2074. PubMed ID: 34131889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104468. PubMed ID: 33160240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J; Bailey H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):432-47. PubMed ID: 19653800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Do learners predict a shift from recency to primacy with delay?
    Storm BC; Bjork RA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1204-1214. PubMed ID: 27380499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred?
    Toppino TC; Cohen MS; Davis ML; Moors AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 19686028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Children's metacognition and cognitive offloading in an immediate memory task.
    Iley C; Medimorec S
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1448-1455. PubMed ID: 38806733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of self-directed online metacognitive listening practice on Chinese EFL learners' listening ability, metacognition, and self-efficacy.
    Pei T; Suwanthep J; Lu H
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1285059. PubMed ID: 38022949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.