These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094989)

  • 41. Improving metacognitive accuracy: how failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence.
    Miller TM; Geraci L
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():131-40. PubMed ID: 25286123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of instruction on learners' ability to generate an effective pathway in the method of loci.
    Massen C; Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B; Krings L; Hilbig BE
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):724-31. PubMed ID: 19575328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice.
    Zhang M; Chen X; Liu XL
    Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 30295147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mending metacognitive illusions: a comparison of mnemonic-based and theory-based procedures.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Sep; 32(5):1133-45. PubMed ID: 16938051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.
    Hourihan KL; Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 27527533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What constrains people's ability to learn about the testing effect through task experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; McLeod M
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1387-1404. PubMed ID: 36093735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Judgments of learning index relative confidence, not subjective probability.
    Zawadzka K; Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Nov; 43(8):1168-79. PubMed ID: 26111879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1666-1674. PubMed ID: 31161529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Diminished testing benefits in young adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Dudukovic NM; Gottshall JL; Cavanaugh PA; Moody CT
    Memory; 2015; 23(8):1264-76. PubMed ID: 25385006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning.
    Imundo MN; Pan SC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 33174522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Updating metacognitive control in response to expected retention intervals.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):347-361. PubMed ID: 27770254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The forward testing effect on self-regulated study time allocation and metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):263-277. PubMed ID: 28333482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests.
    Kornell N; Rhodes MG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 23544472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
    Abel M; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis.
    Stiers P; Falbo L; Goulas A; van Gog T; de Bruin A
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():11-23. PubMed ID: 26883066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Do people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Foster NL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1253-1269. PubMed ID: 28707177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.