These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29094992)

  • 1. The replicability of the negative testing effect: Differences across participant populations.
    Mulligan NW; Rawson KA; Peterson DJ; Wissman KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):752-763. PubMed ID: 29094992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does testing impair relational processing? Failed attempts to replicate the negative testing effect.
    Rawson KA; Wissman KT; Vaughn KE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1326-36. PubMed ID: 25961357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative and positive testing effects in terms of item-specific and relational information.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):859-71. PubMed ID: 25181496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing why the testing effect is moderated by experimental design.
    Mulligan NW; Buchin ZL; West JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1293-1308. PubMed ID: 31697142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards augmented human memory: Retrieval-induced forgetting and retrieval practice in an interactive, end-of-day review.
    Cinel C; Cortis Mack C; Ward G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 May; 147(5):632-661. PubMed ID: 29745709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of retrieval practice depend on item difficulty and intelligence.
    Minear M; Coane JH; Boland SC; Cooney LH; Albat M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1474-1486. PubMed ID: 29648873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1403-16. PubMed ID: 23421508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.
    Jonker TR; Wammes JD; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):689-699. PubMed ID: 30211591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Coyne J; Cohen A; Deluca J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 95(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 24231401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the relationships among item recognition, source recognition, and recall from an individual differences perspective.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1578-85. PubMed ID: 19857028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Competitive retrieval is not a prerequisite for forgetting in the retrieval practice paradigm.
    Camp G; Dalm S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 26569141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.