441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29095758)
1. Patient-reported Outcomes for Assessment of Quality of Life in Refractive Error: A Systematic Review.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Goggin M; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Dec; 94(12):1102-1119. PubMed ID: 29095758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Constructing Item Banks for Measuring Quality of Life in Refractive Error.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Fenwick EK; Shrestha MK; Sharma S; Sharma B; Kafle K; Kharal A; Kaiti R; Dhungana P; Nepal BP; Thapa S; Lamoureux E; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 95(7):575-587. PubMed ID: 29957741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Questionnaires for Measuring Refractive Surgery Outcomes.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Lundström M; Goggin M; Pesudovs K
J Refract Surg; 2017 Jun; 33(6):416-424. PubMed ID: 28586503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.
Hays RD; Mangione CM; Ellwein L; Lindblad AS; Spritzer KL; McDonnell PJ
Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2292-301. PubMed ID: 14644710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Item banks for measurement of refractive error-specific quality of life.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Watson SL; Fenwick EK; Pesudovs K
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 May; 41(3):591-602. PubMed ID: 33650713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations.
Khadka J; McAlinden C; Pesudovs K
Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 90(8):720-44. PubMed ID: 23873034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of refractive error on quality of life: a qualitative study.
Kandel H; Khadka J; Goggin M; Pesudovs K
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 45(7):677-688. PubMed ID: 28370795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Modular Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument for Electronic Assessment and Treatment Monitoring: Web-Based Development and Psychometric Validation of Core Thrive Items.
Wicks P; McCaffrey S; Goodwin K; Black R; Hoole M; Heywood J
J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):e12075. PubMed ID: 30681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a refractive error quality of life scale for Thai adults (the REQ-Thai).
Sukhawarn R; Wiratchai N; Tatsanavivat P; Pitiyanuwat S; Kanato M; Srivannaboon S; Guyatt GH
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):978-84. PubMed ID: 21863681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Instruments measuring the disease-specific quality of life of family carers of people with neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review.
Page TE; Farina N; Brown A; Daley S; Bowling A; Basset T; Livingston G; Knapp M; Murray J; Banerjee S
BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013611. PubMed ID: 28360239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality-of-life outcomes of long-term contact lens wear: A systematic review.
Kandel H
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2022 Feb; 45(1):101521. PubMed ID: 34656447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups.
Berry S; Mangione CM; Lindblad AS; McDonnell PJ
Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2285-91. PubMed ID: 14644709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation.
Pesudovs K; Garamendi E; Elliott DB
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(10):769-77. PubMed ID: 15557851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient-reported outcome measures in amblyopia and strabismus: a systematic review.
Kumaran SE; Khadka J; Baker R; Pesudovs K
Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Jul; 101(4):460-484. PubMed ID: 28636173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Orthokeratology and Contact Lens Quality of Life Questionnaire (OCL-QoL).
McAlinden C; Lipson M
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Sep; 44(5):279-285. PubMed ID: 29219898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease.
Huang H; Grant JA; Miller BS; Mirza FM; Gagnier JJ
Am J Sports Med; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2572-82. PubMed ID: 25622986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic literature review and assessment of patient-reported outcome instruments in sickle cell disease.
Sarri G; Bhor M; Abogunrin S; Farmer C; Nandal S; Halloway R; Revicki DA
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 May; 16(1):99. PubMed ID: 29784054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of patient-reported outcome instruments measuring health-related quality of life and satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral therapy.
Roborel de Climens A; Tunceli K; Arnould B; Germain N; Iglay K; Norquist J; Brodovicz KG
Curr Med Res Opin; 2015 Apr; 31(4):643-65. PubMed ID: 25708743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Surgical and Traumatic Scars: A Systematic Review of their Development, Content, and Psychometric Validation.
Mundy LR; Miller HC; Klassen AF; Cano SJ; Pusic AL
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(5):792-800. PubMed ID: 27357634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
