459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29096042)
1. What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire.
Quinn MM; Smith T; Kalmar EL; Burgoon JM
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):358-365. PubMed ID: 29096042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First year medical students' learning style preferences and their correlation with performance in different subjects within the medical course.
Hernández-Torrano D; Ali S; Chan CK
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Aug; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28789690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of study approaches and course design on academic success in the undergraduate anatomy laboratory.
Eleazer CD; Scopa Kelso R
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Sep; 11(5):496-509. PubMed ID: 29314722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Another Nail in the Coffin for Learning Styles? Disparities among Undergraduate Anatomy Students' Study Strategies, Class Performance, and Reported VARK Learning Styles.
Husmann PR; O'Loughlin VD
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Jan; 12(1):6-19. PubMed ID: 29533532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
Shaffer JF
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring anatomy and physiology using iPad applications.
Chakraborty TR; Cooperstein DF
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):336-345. PubMed ID: 29112797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association between learning style preferences and anatomy assessment outcomes in graduate-entry and undergraduate medical students.
O'Mahony SM; Sbayeh A; Horgan M; O'Flynn S; O'Tuathaigh CM
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Jul; 9(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 26845590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "flipped classroom" approach: Stimulating positive learning attitudes and improving mastery of histology among medical students.
Cheng X; Ka Ho Lee K; Chang EY; Yang X
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):317-327. PubMed ID: 28199052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio.
Durán CE; Bahena EN; Rodríguez Mde L; Baca GJ; Uresti AS; Elizondo-Omaña RE; López SG
Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 22383124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The integration of an anatomy massive open online course (MOOC) into a medical anatomy curriculum.
Swinnerton BJ; Morris NP; Hotchkiss S; Pickering JD
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 27315160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of educational comics in learning anatomy among multiple student groups.
Kim J; Chung MS; Jang HG; Chung BS
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 27233080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of flipped classroom pedagogy to the human gross anatomy laboratory: Student preferences and learning outcomes.
Fleagle TR; Borcherding NC; Harris J; Hoffmann DS
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):385-396. PubMed ID: 29283505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing student engagement and self-regulated learning in a medical gross anatomy course.
Pizzimenti MA; Axelson RD
Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 24845421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course?
Farkas GJ; Mazurek E; Marone JR
Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 26301828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using collaborative two-stage examinations to address test anxiety in a large enrollment gateway course.
Fournier KA; Couret J; Ramsay JB; Caulkins JL
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):409-422. PubMed ID: 28135034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
