These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

516 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29096874)

  • 21. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Proactive distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search.
    Huang C; Vilotijević A; Theeuwes J; Donk M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):918-927. PubMed ID: 33620698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computation revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning.
    Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Apr; 150(4):710-728. PubMed ID: 33048567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical regularities across trials bias attentional selection.
    Li AS; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Aug; 46(8):860-870. PubMed ID: 32324032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability.
    Lin R; Li X; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 33078381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial filtering restricts the attentional window during both singleton and feature-based visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2360-2378. PubMed ID: 31993978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical regularities bias overt attention.
    Wang B; Samara I; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1813-1821. PubMed ID: 30919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related differences in the statistical learning of target selection and distractor suppression.
    Lega C; Di Caro V; Strina V; Daini R
    Psychol Aging; 2023 May; 38(3):188-202. PubMed ID: 36892906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Habituation to abrupt-onset distractors with different spatial occurrence probability.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):649-666. PubMed ID: 35851440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):860-870. PubMed ID: 29476331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigating the role of spatial filtering on distractor suppression.
    Mohite V; Prasad S; Mishra RK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Oct; 86(7):2552-2563. PubMed ID: 38148431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Polarity-dependent Effects of Biparietal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Interplay between Target Location and Distractor Saliency in Visual Attention.
    Chechlacz M; Hansen PC; Geng JJ; Cazzoli D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 30(6):851-866. PubMed ID: 29393718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension.
    Sauter M; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2080-2097. PubMed ID: 30688477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distractor filtering is affected by local and global distractor probability, emerges very rapidly but is resistant to extinction.
    Valsecchi M; Turatto M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2458-2472. PubMed ID: 33948881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicitly learned suppression of irrelevant spatial locations.
    Leber AB; Gwinn RE; Hong Y; O'Toole RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1873-1881. PubMed ID: 27225635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probability cueing of distractor locations: both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction.
    Goschy H; Bakos S; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1195. PubMed ID: 25414676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.