These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29097699)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of final impressions from three-dimensional printed custom trays.
    Sun Y; Chen H; Li H; Deng K; Zhao T; Wang Y; Zhou Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14958. PubMed ID: 29097699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of tissue stops on 3D-printed custom trays.
    Deng K; Chen H; Li R; Li L; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1807. PubMed ID: 30755638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a novel 3D-printed custom tray for the impressions of edentulous jaws.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhou Y; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2022 Oct; 125():104279. PubMed ID: 36070825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Establishment and preliminary clinical evaluation of edentulous custom trays designed and fabricated by chair-side CAD and 3D printing systems].
    Wang KP; Ye HQ; Chen H; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhou YS
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Apr; 51(2):349-355. PubMed ID: 30996381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial.
    Yang X; Liu Y; Li Y; Zhao Y; Di P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 33593675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Implant Impression Accuracy Using Different Trays and Techniques With a 3D Superimposition Method.
    Unsal G; Caglar A; Tural M; Orhan M; Alkan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 0(0):1-19. PubMed ID: 38607357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer aided design and 3-dimensional printing for the production of custom trays of maxillary edentulous jaws based on 3-dimensional scan of primary impression].
    Chen H; Zhao T; Wang Y; Sun YC
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):900-904. PubMed ID: 27752178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of production and clinical working time of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) custom trays for complete denture].
    Wei L; Chen H; Zhou YS; Sun YC; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Feb; 49(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 28203010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative analysis of the selective pressure impression technique using CAD-CAM technology: A pilot clinical study.
    Stein BE; Yoon HI; Mattie H; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1289-1294. PubMed ID: 33992466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional Stability and Retention Strength of Impressions to Custom Impression Trays Fabricated Using Conventional Method and Additive Technology - An In-vitro Study.
    Priyadarshini KS; Nandini VV; Marimuthu R; Lathief J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2023 Oct; 34(4):427-432. PubMed ID: 38739826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Precision of Custom Edentulous Trays Fabricated with 3D Printing Technologies.
    Wang X; Su J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 33570526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of multiple pouring on the accuracy of casts made using 3D-printed custom trays with different spacer thicknesses: A research study.
    Tavakolizadeh S; Razaghi MJ; Pakravan P; Sedaghat Monfared M; Beyabanaki E; Ghoveizi R
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2020; 14(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 32454956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of FDM three-dimensional printing technology in the digital manufacture of custom edentulous mandible trays.
    Chen H; Yang X; Chen L; Wang Y; Sun Y
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jan; 6():19207. PubMed ID: 26763620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chairside 3-D printed impression trays: a new approach to increase the accuracy of conventional implant impression taking? An in vitro study.
    Schmidt A; Berschin C; Wöstmann B; Schlenz MA
    Int J Implant Dent; 2023 Dec; 9(1):47. PubMed ID: 38052992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches.
    Liu Y; Di P; Zhao Y; Hao Q; Tian J; Cui H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(4):1007–1014. PubMed ID: 31107937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design parameters of polylactic acid custom trays manufactured by fused deposition modeling for partial edentulism: Consideration of the accuracy of the definitive cast.
    Li H; Ma K; Sun Y; Chen H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):288.e1-288.e11. PubMed ID: 34924189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novel method of fabricating individual trays for maxillectomy patients by computer-aided design and rapid prototyping.
    Huang Z; Wang XZ; Hou YZ
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 24975647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Progress in research and application of the edentulous custom trays].
    Sun YC; Jin EL; Zhao T; Wang Y; Ye HQ; Zhou YS
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Nov; 51(11):698-701. PubMed ID: 27806767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
    Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.