168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29098274)
21. Children's understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of discourse irony.
Filippova E; Astington JW
Child Dev; 2010; 81(3):913-28. PubMed ID: 20573113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Individual differences in sarcasm interpretation and use: Evidence from the UK and China.
Zhu N; Filik R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):445-463. PubMed ID: 37011176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Children's Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers.
Banasik-Jemielniak N; Bokus B
J Psycholinguist Res; 2019 Oct; 48(5):1217-1240. PubMed ID: 31312955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. French-speaking children's understanding of sarcasm: the role of intonation and context.
Laval V; Bert-Erboul A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):610-20. PubMed ID: 16197276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Processing of ironic language in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder.
Pexman PM; Rostad KR; McMorris CA; Climie EA; Stowkowy J; Glenwright MR
J Autism Dev Disord; 2011 Aug; 41(8):1097-112. PubMed ID: 21061054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. It's no laughing matter: An exploratory study of the use of ironic versus sarcastic humor in health-related advertising messages.
Iles IA; Nan X
Health Mark Q; 2017; 34(3):187-201. PubMed ID: 28704141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The cognitive demands of remembering a speaker's perspective and managing common ground size modulate 8- and 10-year-olds' perspective-taking abilities.
Zhao L; Wang JJ; Apperly IA
J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Oct; 174():130-149. PubMed ID: 29940398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Adjustment of Complexity on Sarcasm Processing in Chinese: Evidence from Reading Time Indicators.
Li Y; Shi H; Li S; Gao L; Gao X
Brain Sci; 2023 Jan; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36831749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Individuals with autism spectrum disorders do not use social stereotypes in irony comprehension.
Zalla T; Amsellem F; Chaste P; Ervas F; Leboyer M; Champagne-Lavau M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95568. PubMed ID: 24748103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multi-Rule Based Ensemble Feature Selection Model for Sarcasm Type Detection in Twitter.
Sundararajan K; Palanisamy A
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2020; 2020():2860479. PubMed ID: 32405293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Age-related differences in the ability to decode intentions from non-literal language.
Pomareda C; Simkute A; Phillips LH
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102865. PubMed ID: 31228718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A contextual-based approach for sarcasm detection.
Helal NA; Hassan A; Badr NL; Afify YM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):15415. PubMed ID: 38965307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. "That's really clever!" Ironic hyperbole understanding in children.
Aguert M; LE Vallois C; Martel K; Laval V
J Child Lang; 2018 Jan; 45(1):260-272. PubMed ID: 28462762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comprehension of sarcasm, metaphor and simile in Williams syndrome.
Godbee K; Porter M
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2013; 48(6):651-65. PubMed ID: 24165362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony.
Dews S; Winner E; Kaplan J; Rosenblatt E; Hunt M; Lim K; McGovern A; Qualter A; Smarsh B
Child Dev; 1996 Dec; 67(6):3071-85. PubMed ID: 9071771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The illusory transparency of intention: linguistic perspective taking in text.
Keysar B
Cogn Psychol; 1994 Apr; 26(2):165-208. PubMed ID: 8205772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cross-cultural nuances in sarcasm comprehension: a comparative study of Chinese and American perspectives.
Du Y; He H; Chu Z
Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1349002. PubMed ID: 38445055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm.
McDonald S; Pearce S
Brain Lang; 1996 Apr; 53(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 8722901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Judging emoji by occupation: A case of emoji-based sarcasm interpretation.
Cui J; Dandan YR; Jiang G
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Apr; 234():103870. PubMed ID: 36804172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm.
Uchiyama HT; Saito DN; Tanabe HC; Harada T; Seki A; Ohno K; Koeda T; Sadato N
Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):563-83. PubMed ID: 21333979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
