BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29098278)

  • 1. Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.
    Arnaoutakis D; Bahrami A; Cohn JE; Smith JE
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 20(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 29098278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autogenous Bone Cranioplasty: Review of a 42-Year Experience by a Single Surgeon.
    Cabbad NC; Stalder MW; Arroyave A; Wolfe EM; Wolfe SA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 31136489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Innovation to Pediatric Cranioplasty.
    Konofaos P; Wallace RD
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):519-524. PubMed ID: 30531278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between autologous bone grafts and acrylic (PMMA) implants - A retrospective analysis of 286 cranioplasty procedures.
    Vince GH; Kraschl J; Rauter H; Stein M; Grossauer S; Uhl E
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 61():205-209. PubMed ID: 30396817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents.
    Williams L; Fan K; Bentley R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 44(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27174495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cryopreservation of Autologous Cranial Bone Flaps for Cranioplasty: A Large Sample Retrospective Study.
    Fan MC; Wang QL; Sun P; Zhan SH; Guo P; Deng WS; Dong Q
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 109():e853-e859. PubMed ID: 29107719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty.
    Honeybul S; Morrison DA; Ho KM; Lind CR; Geelhoed E
    J Neurosurg; 2017 Jan; 126(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 26991387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
    Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing for Autogenous, Split Calvarial Bone Graft-based Cranioplasty: Optimizing Reconstruction of Large, Complex Skull Defects.
    Musavi L; Macmillan A; Lopez J; Dorafshar AH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 30507889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty in Pediatric Patients.
    Ma IT; Symon MR; Bristol RE; Beals SP; Joganic EF; Adelson PD; Shafron DH; Singh DJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Jan; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29049146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Custom porous polyethylene implants for large-scale pediatric skull reconstruction: early outcomes.
    Lin AY; Kinsella CR; Rottgers SA; Smith DM; Grunwaldt LJ; Cooper GM; Losee JE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 22337376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study on Methods of Cranial Reconstruction.
    Iaccarino C; Viaroli E; Fricia M; Serchi E; Poli T; Servadei F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12):2375-8. PubMed ID: 26253012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes and Complications of Pediatric Cranioplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Abu-Ghname A; Banuelos J; Oliver JD; Vyas K; Daniels D; Sharaf B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Sep; 144(3):433e-443e. PubMed ID: 31461029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Cranioplasty using autologous calvarial bone graft in combination with titanium mesh plates for patients with a history of bone infections after initial cranioplasty].
    Kamoshima Y; Sawamura Y; Kawashima K; Osanai T; Kashiwazaki D; Yamauchi T; Houkin K
    No Shinkei Geka; 2011 Apr; 39(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 21447849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts.
    Piitulainen JM; Kauko T; Aitasalo KM; Vuorinen V; Vallittu PK; Posti JP
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):708-14. PubMed ID: 25681593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?
    Ng ZY; Nawaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 25(1):e55-8. PubMed ID: 24406603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Catcher's mask cranioplasty for extensive cranial defects in children with an open head trauma: a novel application of partial cranioplasty.
    Takumi I; Akimoto M
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2008 Aug; 24(8):927-32. PubMed ID: 18228025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pediatric Cranioplasty Patients With Hostile Reconstructive Environments: Split Calvarial Versus Prosthetic Implant.
    Burge KG; Soto E; Derise N; Rocque BG; Grant JH; Myers RP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2023 Jun; 90(6S Suppl 4):S337-S341. PubMed ID: 36921338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cranioplasty is not required in the reconstruction of small combined scalp and calvarial defects.
    Ribeiro LM; Bhindi N; Fox C; Ramakrishnan A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jun; 93():18-23. PubMed ID: 38608533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.