These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29098362)
1. Conventional and New Ways of Governing Forest Threats: A Study of Stakeholder Coherence in Sweden. Eriksson L Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 61(1):103-115. PubMed ID: 29098362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of USDA Forest Service and Stakeholder Motivations and Experiences in Collaborative Federal Forest Governance in the Western United States. Davis EJ; White EM; Cerveny LK; Seesholtz D; Nuss ML; Ulrich DR Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):908-921. PubMed ID: 28815317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stakeholder opinions on scientific forest management policy implementation in Nepal. Joshi O; Parajuli R; Kharel G; Poudyal NC; Taylor E PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203106. PubMed ID: 30183725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public trust and knowledge in the context of emerging climate-adaptive forestry policies. Peterson St-Laurent G; Hagerman S; Findlater KM; Kozak R J Environ Manage; 2019 Jul; 242():474-486. PubMed ID: 31075642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of forest management systems on natural resource use and provision of ecosystem services in Tanzania. Strauch AM; Rurai MT; Almedom AM J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 180():35-44. PubMed ID: 27203700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Knowledge and Value Basis of Private Forest Management in Sweden: Actual Knowledge, Confidence, and Value Priorities. Eriksson L; Fries C Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 66(4):549-563. PubMed ID: 32696092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In the eye of the stakeholder: The challenges of governing social forest values. Sténs A; Bjärstig T; Nordström EM; Sandström C; Fries C; Johansson J Ambio; 2016 Feb; 45 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26744045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding perceptions of stakeholder groups about Forestry Best Management Practices in Georgia. Tumpach C; Dwivedi P; Izlar R; Cook C J Environ Manage; 2018 May; 213():374-381. PubMed ID: 29502022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia. Ebeling J; Yasué M J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1145-53. PubMed ID: 18614273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water, Forests, People: The Swedish Experience in Building Resilient Landscapes. Eriksson M; Samuelson L; Jägrud L; Mattsson E; Celander T; Malmer A; Bengtsson K; Johansson O; Schaaf N; Svending O; Tengberg A Environ Manage; 2018 Jul; 62(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 29785612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding consistencies and gaps between desired forest futures: An analysis of visions from stakeholder groups in Sweden. Sandström C; Carlsson-Kanyama A; Lindahl KB; Sonnek KM; Mossing A; Nordin A; Nordström EM; Räty R Ambio; 2016 Feb; 45 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):100-8. PubMed ID: 26744046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Land use. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Phelps J; Webb EL; Agrawal A Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):312-3. PubMed ID: 20395498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market. Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Designing a carbon market that protects forests in developing countries. Niesten E; Frumhoff PC; Manion M; Hardner JJ Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1875-88. PubMed ID: 12460503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of Swedish Forest Owners' Information and Knowledge-Sharing Networks for Decision-Making: Insights for Climate Change Communication and Adaptation. André K; Baird J; Gerger Swartling Å; Vulturius G; Plummer R Environ Manage; 2017 Jun; 59(6):885-897. PubMed ID: 28275850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing governance of the world's forests. Agrawal A; Chhatre A; Hardin R Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1460-2. PubMed ID: 18556552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. General Public Acceptance of Forest Risk Management Strategies in Sweden: Comparing Three Approaches to Acceptability. Eriksson L; Björkman C; Klapwijk MJ Environ Behav; 2018 Feb; 50(2):159-186. PubMed ID: 29386686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Difficult climate-adaptive decisions in forests as complex social-ecological systems. Findlater K; Kozak R; Hagerman S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(4):. PubMed ID: 35042791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Considering Future Potential Regarding Structural Diversity in Selection of Forest Reserves. Lundström J; Öhman K; Rönnqvist M; Gustafsson L PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148960. PubMed ID: 26866480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stakeholders' perceptions of protected area management following a nationwide community-based conservation reform. Engen S; Fauchald P; Hausner V PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215437. PubMed ID: 31017937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]