163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29098606)
1. Presenting comparative study PRO results to clinicians and researchers: beyond the eye of the beholder.
Brundage M; Blackford A; Tolbert E; Smith K; Bantug E; Snyder C;
Qual Life Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):75-90. PubMed ID: 29098606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Picture This: Presenting Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Research Study Results to Patients.
Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C;
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):994-1005. PubMed ID: 30132393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In proportion: approaches for displaying patient-reported outcome research study results as percentages responding to treatment.
Tolbert E; Brundage M; Bantug E; Blackford AL; Smith K; Snyder C;
Qual Life Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):609-620. PubMed ID: 30498892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What do these scores mean? Presenting patient-reported outcomes data to patients and clinicians to improve interpretability.
Snyder CF; Smith KC; Bantug ET; Tolbert EE; Blackford AL; Brundage MD;
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(10):1848-1859. PubMed ID: 28085201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visualization formats of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a systematic review about preferences and interpretation accuracy.
Albers EAC; Fraterman I; Walraven I; Wilthagen E; Schagen SB; van der Ploeg IM; Wouters MWJM; van de Poll-Franse LV; de Ligt KM
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2022 Mar; 6(1):18. PubMed ID: 35239055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communicating patient-reported outcome scores using graphic formats: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.
Brundage MD; Smith KC; Little EA; Bantug ET; Snyder CF;
Qual Life Res; 2015 Oct; 24(10):2457-72. PubMed ID: 26012839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Making a picture worth a thousand numbers: recommendations for graphically displaying patient-reported outcomes data.
Snyder C; Smith K; Holzner B; Rivera YM; Bantug E; Brundage M;
Qual Life Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):345-356. PubMed ID: 30306533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A powerful partnership: researchers and patients working together to develop a patient-facing summary of clinical trial outcome data.
Ruzich E; Ritchie J; Ginchereau Sowell F; Mansur A; Griffiths P; Birkett H; Harman D; Spink J; James D; Reaney M
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2024 Jan; 31(2):363-374. PubMed ID: 37341698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Engaging stakeholders to improve presentation of patient-reported outcomes data in clinical practice.
Smith KC; Brundage MD; Tolbert E; Little EA; Bantug ET; Snyder CF;
Support Care Cancer; 2016 Oct; 24(10):4149-57. PubMed ID: 27165054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding and preferences regarding risk communication during pregnancy: a survey to facilitate provider communication with patients.
Ferguson M; Shapiro GD; McDonald SD
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100929. PubMed ID: 36931434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communicating quality of life information to cancer patients: a study of six presentation formats.
Brundage M; Feldman-Stewart D; Leis A; Bezjak A; Degner L; Velji K; Zetes-Zanatta L; Tu D; Ritvo P; Pater J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Oct; 23(28):6949-56. PubMed ID: 16192583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acceptability of Routine Evaluations Using Patient-Reported Outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Other Patient-Reported Symptom Outcome Tools in Cancer Outpatients: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience.
Albaba H; Barnes TA; Veitch Z; Brown MC; Shakik S; Su S; Naik H; Wang T; Liang M; Perez-Cosio A; Eng L; Mittmann N; Xu W; Howell D; Liu G
Oncologist; 2019 Nov; 24(11):e1219-e1227. PubMed ID: 31409744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using Uniocular Visual Acuity Substantially Underestimates the Impact of Visual Impairment on Quality of Life Compared with Binocular Visual Acuity.
Kidd Man RE; Liang Gan AT; Fenwick EK; Thakur S; Gupta P; Teo ZL; Cheng CY; Wong TY; Lamoureux EL
Ophthalmology; 2020 Sep; 127(9):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 32222400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cancer patients' understanding of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores presented as bar charts.
Loth FL; Holzner B; Sztankay M; Bliem HR; Raoufi S; Rumpold G; Giesinger JM
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 Dec; 99(12):2012-2017. PubMed ID: 27506581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On Effective Graphic Communication of Health Inequality: Considerations for Health Policy Researchers.
Asada Y; Abel H; Skedgel C; Warner G
Milbank Q; 2017 Dec; 95(4):801-835. PubMed ID: 29226437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of graphic display format on the interpretations of quantitative risk information among adults with lower education and literacy: a randomized experimental study.
McCaffery KJ; Dixon A; Hayen A; Jansen J; Smith S; Simpson JM
Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):532-44. PubMed ID: 22074912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
