BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29098691)

  • 1. Male mate choice via cuticular hydrocarbon pheromones drives reproductive isolation between Drosophila species.
    Shahandeh MP; Pischedda A; Turner TL
    Evolution; 2018 Jan; 72(1):123-135. PubMed ID: 29098691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The search for causal traits of speciation: Divergent female mate preferences target male courtship song, not pheromones, in Drosophila athabasca species complex.
    Yukilevich R; Harvey T; Nguyen S; Kehlbeck J; Park A
    Evolution; 2016 Mar; 70(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 26831347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tissue-Specific cis-Regulatory Divergence Implicates eloF in Inhibiting Interspecies Mating in Drosophila.
    Combs PA; Krupp JJ; Khosla NM; Bua D; Petrov DA; Levine JD; Fraser HB
    Curr Biol; 2018 Dec; 28(24):3969-3975.e3. PubMed ID: 30503619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproductive character displacement of female mate preferences for male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2625-37. PubMed ID: 26299584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila montana: geographic variation, sexual dimorphism and potential roles as pheromones.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ; Schmitt T; Hoikkala A
    J Insect Physiol; 2014 Feb; 61():16-24. PubMed ID: 24373710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of courtship song in female mate choice in South American Cactophilic Drosophila.
    Iglesias PP; Hasson E
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176119. PubMed ID: 28467464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.
    Dyer KA; White BE; Sztepanacz JL; Bewick ER; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 24351014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Female mate recognition and sexual isolation depending on courtship song in Drosophila sechellia and its siblings.
    Tomaru M; Yamada H; Oguma Y
    Genes Genet Syst; 2004 Jun; 79(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 15329495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic analysis of mate discrimination in Drosophila simulans.
    Chu Y; Yang E; Schinaman JM; Chahda JS; Sousa-Neves R
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2335-47. PubMed ID: 23888855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The complex genetic architecture of male mate choice evolution between Drosophila species.
    Shahandeh MP; Turner TL
    Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Jun; 124(6):737-750. PubMed ID: 32203250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. IX. Host plant and population specific epicuticular hydrocarbon expression influences mate choice and sexual selection.
    Havens JA; Etges WJ
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):562-76. PubMed ID: 23286346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of quantitative trait loci function through analysis of multiple cuticular hydrocarbons differing between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia females.
    Gleason JM; James RA; Wicker-Thomas C; Ritchie MG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2009 Nov; 103(5):416-24. PubMed ID: 19654611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Territory defense as a condition-dependent component of male reproductive success in Drosophila serrata.
    White AJ; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2015 Feb; 69(2):407-18. PubMed ID: 25491256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for no sexual isolation between Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta.
    Kim YK; Phillips DR; Tao Y
    Ecol Evol; 2013 Jul; 3(7):2061-74. PubMed ID: 23919152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coevolution of male and female mate choice can destabilize reproductive isolation.
    Aubier TG; Kokko H; Joron M
    Nat Commun; 2019 Nov; 10(1):5122. PubMed ID: 31719522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid female mate choice as a species isolating mechanism: environment matters.
    Schmidt EM; Pfennig KS
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):865-9. PubMed ID: 26717048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.