BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29100451)

  • 1. Comparison of the efficacy between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Pan XB; Chen KH; Huang ST; Jiang YM; Ma JL; Liang ZG; Qu S; Li L; Chen L; Zhu XD
    Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(44):78096-78104. PubMed ID: 29100451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparative study at SKIMS Tertiary Care Institute.
    Fatima K; Andleeb A; Sofi MA; Rasool MT; Fir A; Nasreen S; Dar NA
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(1):133-139. PubMed ID: 35381774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up.
    Zhang MX; Li J; Shen GP; Zou X; Xu JJ; Jiang R; You R; Hua YJ; Sun Y; Ma J; Hong MH; Chen MY
    Eur J Cancer; 2015 Nov; 51(17):2587-95. PubMed ID: 26318726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A retrospective study comparing the outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of children and adolescent nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Qiu WZ; Peng XS; Xia HQ; Huang PY; Guo X; Cao KJ
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Aug; 143(8):1563-1572. PubMed ID: 28342002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy alone in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    OuYang PY; Shi D; Sun R; Zhu YJ; Xiao Y; Zhang LN; Zhang XH; Chen ZY; Lan XW; Tang J; Gao YH; Ma J; Deng W; Xie FY
    Oncotarget; 2016 May; 7(22):33408-17. PubMed ID: 27058901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.
    Zhang LN; Gao YH; Lan XW; Tang J; Su Z; Ma J; Deng W; OuYang PY; Xie FY
    Oncotarget; 2015 Dec; 6(41):44019-29. PubMed ID: 26528755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with involvement of the cervical spine.
    Jiang H; Wang G; Song H; Xu H; Zhang Y; Zhou Y; Cai H; Duan S
    Oncol Lett; 2015 Nov; 10(5):2731-2738. PubMed ID: 26722233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the treatment outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with parapharyngeal space extension.
    Tang LL; Chen L; Mao YP; Li WF; Sun Y; Liu LZ; Lin AH; Mai HQ; Shao JY; Li L; Ma J
    Radiother Oncol; 2015 Aug; 116(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 26316395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of long-term survival outcomes and failure patterns of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis.
    Zhao W; Lei H; Zhu X; Li L; Qu S; Liang X
    Oncotarget; 2016 Dec; 7(52):86914-86925. PubMed ID: 27894100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Peng G; Wang T; Yang KY; Zhang S; Zhang T; Li Q; Han J; Wu G
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Sep; 104(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 22995588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Changing Therapeutic Role of Chemo-radiotherapy for Loco-regionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Two/Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    You R; Cao YS; Huang PY; Chen L; Yang Q; Liu YP; Zou X; Zhang YN; Jiang R; Zhang MX; Duan CY; Lin AH; Hong MH; Chen MY
    Theranostics; 2017; 7(19):4825-4835. PubMed ID: 29187906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IMRT vs. 2D-radiotherapy or 3D-conformal radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma : Survival outcome in a Korean multi-institutional retrospective study (KROG 11-06).
    Moon SH; Cho KH; Lee CG; Keum KC; Kim YS; Wu HG; Kim JH; Ahn YC; Oh D; Lee JH
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 Jun; 192(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 26972085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate endpoints shortening the therapeutic evaluation duration for different subgroups of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A retrospective analysis of 830 patients stratified by the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system and plasma Epstein-Barr viral.
    Zhou S; Chen C; Liu SR; Tao YL; Chang H; Wang XH; Yang X; Zhang WW; Liu S; Ding SR; Wang GN; Xia YF
    J Cancer; 2018; 9(18):3352-3360. PubMed ID: 30271496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    Kang M; Zhou P; Li G; Yan H; Feng G; Liu M; Zhu J; Wang R
    Oncotarget; 2017 Sep; 8(41):70586-70594. PubMed ID: 29050304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of 2138 Patients.
    Xu C; Zhang LH; Chen YP; Liu X; Zhou GQ; Lin AH; Sun Y; Ma J
    J Cancer; 2017; 8(2):287-297. PubMed ID: 28243333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value and predictive threshold of tumor volume for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
    He YX; Wang Y; Cao PF; Shen L; Zhao YJ; Zhang ZJ; Chen DM; Yang TB; Huang XQ; Qin Z; Dai YY; Shen LF
    Chin J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 35(1):96. PubMed ID: 27852284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy in the treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score analysis.
    Dasgupta T; Rothenstein D; Chou JF; Zhang Z; Wright JL; Saltz LB; Temple LK; Paty PB; Weiser MR; Guillem JG; Nash GM; Goodman KA
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 May; 107(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 23692961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy provides better quality of life than two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy for patients with stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Pan XB; Huang ST; Chen KH; Jiang YM; Ma JL; Qu S; Li L; Chen L; Zhu XD
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(28):46211-46218. PubMed ID: 28515352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Technical advancement improves survival in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving definitive radiotherapy].
    Wang JB; Jiang W; Ji Z; Cao JZ; Liu LP; Men Y; Xu C; Wang XZ; Hui ZG; Liang J; Lyu JM; Zhou ZM; Xiao ZF; Feng QF; Chen DF; Zhang HX; Yin WB; Wang LH
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 38(8):607-14. PubMed ID: 27531481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A matched cohort analysis of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma].
    Liu XQ; Luo W; Tang YQ; He ZC; Sun Y; Ma J; Lu TX; Liu MZ
    Ai Zheng; 2008 Jun; 27(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 18570734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.