These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29100624)

  • 1. Does duration of abstinence affect the live-birth rate after assisted reproductive technology? A retrospective analysis of 1,030 cycles.
    Periyasamy AJ; Mahasampath G; Karthikeyan M; Mangalaraj AM; Kunjummen AT; Kamath MS
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Dec; 108(6):988-992. PubMed ID: 29100624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: an analysis of the United States Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance Data, 2011-2012.
    Chang J; Boulet SL; Jeng G; Flowers L; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):394-400. PubMed ID: 26551441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of live-birth defects after luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs. conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.
    Chen H; Wang Y; Lyu Q; Ai A; Fu Y; Tian H; Cai R; Hong Q; Chen Q; Shoham Z; Kuang Y
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1194-1201.e2. PubMed ID: 25813280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extremities of body mass index and their association with pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization in the United States.
    Kawwass JF; Kulkarni AD; Hipp HS; Crawford S; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Dec; 106(7):1742-1750. PubMed ID: 27666564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology.
    Martin AS; Chang J; Zhang Y; Kawwass JF; Boulet SL; McKane P; Bernson D; Kissin DM; Jamieson DJ;
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):954-960. PubMed ID: 28292615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased odds of live birth in fresh in vitro fertilization cycles with shorter ovarian stimulation.
    Pereira N; Friedman C; Hutchinson AP; Lekovich JP; Elias RT; Rosenwaks Z
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):104-109.e2. PubMed ID: 27793370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?
    Kang HJ; Melnick AP; Stewart JD; Xu K; Rosenwaks Z
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):597-602. PubMed ID: 27143516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of female and male body mass indices on the treatment outcomes and neonatal birth weights associated with in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment in China.
    Wang X; Hao J; Zhang F; Li J; Kong H; Guo Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):460-6. PubMed ID: 27155105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.
    Styer AK; Luke B; Vitek W; Christianson MS; Baker VL; Christy AY; Polotsky AJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):80-89. PubMed ID: 26997248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening: a reanalysis of United States assisted reproductive technology data 2011-2012.
    Kushnir VA; Darmon SK; Albertini DF; Barad DH; Gleicher N
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jul; 106(1):75-79. PubMed ID: 26952783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing recipient body mass index: an analysis of 22,317 fresh donor/recipient cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System registry.
    Provost MP; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Steward RG; Eaton JL; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):364-8. PubMed ID: 26523329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue as sole luteal support in antagonist-based assisted reproductive technology cycles.
    Bar Hava I; Blueshtein M; Ganer Herman H; Omer Y; Ben David G
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):130-135.e1. PubMed ID: 28228316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles.
    Desai N; Ploskonka S; Goodman L; Attaran M; Goldberg JM; Austin C; Falcone T
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov; 106(6):1370-1378. PubMed ID: 27565255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States.
    Perkins KM; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM;
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):435-442.e2. PubMed ID: 27087401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between paternal somatic health and assisted reproductive technology outcomes.
    Eisenberg ML; Li S; Wise LA; Lynch CD; Nakajima S; Meyers SA; Behr B; Baker VL
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):559-65. PubMed ID: 27179785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pregnancy outcomes decline with increasing body mass index: analysis of 239,127 fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles from the 2008-2010 Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    Provost MP; Acharya KS; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Steward RG; Eaton JL; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):663-669. PubMed ID: 26627120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Jamieson DJ; Stone C; Mullen J; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 26515377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology and perinatal outcomes: conventional versus discordant-sibling design.
    Dhalwani NN; Boulet SL; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; McKane P; Bailey MA; Hood ME; Tata LJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):710-716.e2. PubMed ID: 27187051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology.
    Wennberg AL; Opdahl S; Bergh C; Aaris Henningsen AK; Gissler M; Romundstad LB; Pinborg A; Tiitinen A; Skjærven R; Wennerholm UB
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Oct; 106(5):1142-1149.e14. PubMed ID: 27399261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.