These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29100964)
1. Development and validation of the experimental wound assessment tool (EWAT) for pressure ulcer in laboratory animals. Lima RO; Fechine FV; Lisboa MR; Leitão FK; Vale ML J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2018; 90():13-18. PubMed ID: 29100964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. Sanada H; Moriguchi T; Miyachi Y; Ohura T; Nakajo T; Tokunaga K; Fukui M; Sugama J; Kitagawa A J Wound Care; 2004 Jan; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 14969021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies. Sanada H; Iizaka S; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y; Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(5):559-67. PubMed ID: 22092794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care settings. Jesada EC; Warren JI; Goodman D; Iliuta RW; Thurkauf G; McLaughlin MK; Johnson JE; Strassner L J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 23466719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Development and Preliminary Validity Testing of the Healing Progression Rate Tool. Young DL; Estocado N; Feng D; Black J Ostomy Wound Manage; 2017 Sep; 63(8):32-44. PubMed ID: 28933702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive validity of granulation tissue color measured by digital image analysis for deep pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Iizaka S; Kaitani T; Sugama J; Nakagami G; Naito A; Koyanagi H; Konya C; Sanada H Wound Repair Regen; 2013; 21(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 23110386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds. Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. Thomas DR; Rodeheaver GT; Bartolucci AA; Franz RA; Sussman C; Ferrell BA; Cuddigan J; Stotts NA; Maklebust J Adv Wound Care; 1997 Sep; 10(5):96-101. PubMed ID: 9362591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pressure RElieving Support SUrfaces: a Randomised Evaluation 2 (PRESSURE 2) photographic validation sub-study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. McGinnis E; Brown S; Collier H; Faulks P; Gilberts R; Greenwood C; Henderson V; Muir D; Nelson A; Nixon J; Smith I; Stubbs N; Walker K; Wilson L; Coleman S Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):132. PubMed ID: 28320482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing. Matsui Y; Furue M; Sanada H; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 21539648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhanced assessment of the wound-healing process by accurate multiview tissue classification. Wannous H; Lucas Y; Treuillet S IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):315-26. PubMed ID: 20875969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pressure ulcer surface area measurement using instant full-scale photography and transparency tracings. Lucas C; Classen J; Harrison D; De H Adv Skin Wound Care; 2002; 15(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 11902356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive validity of weekly monitoring of wound status using DESIGN-R score change for pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Iizaka S; Sanada H; Matsui Y; Furue M; Tachibana T; Nakayama T; Sugama J; Furuta K; Tachi M; Tokunaga K; Miyachi Y; Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 22747950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers . Zhong X; Nagase T; Huang L; Kaitani T; Iizaka S; Yamamoto Y; Kanazawa T; Sanada H Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Feb; 59(2):36-43. PubMed ID: 23388396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study. Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Harputlu D; Patlan A Wound Repair Regen; 2019 Jul; 27(4):386-395. PubMed ID: 30828890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot study to evaluate the role of the Spinal Cord Impairment Pressure Ulcer Monitoring Tool (SCI-PUMT) in clinical decisions for pressure ulcer treatment. Thomason SS; Graves BA; Madaris L Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Dec; 60(12):28-36. PubMed ID: 25485550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]