204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101414)
1. Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.
Yang X; Xue C; He Y; Zhao M; Luo M; Wang P; Bai D
J Orofac Orthop; 2018 Jan; 79(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 29101414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of self-ligating brackets on oral hygiene and discomfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
Yang X; Su N; Shi Z; Xiang Z; He Y; Han X; Bai D
Int J Dent Hyg; 2017 Feb; 15(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 27095145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.
Yang X; He Y; Chen T; Zhao M; Yan Y; Wang H; Bai D
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Mar; 78(2):121-128. PubMed ID: 28224175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of self-ligating vs conventionally ligated brackets during initial alignment.
Ong E; McCallum H; Griffin MP; Ho C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):138.e1-7; discussion 138-9. PubMed ID: 20691348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Are self-ligating brackets more efficient than conventional brackets ? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled and split-mouth trials].
Wagner D; Lévy-Benichou H; Lefebvre F; Bolender Y
Orthod Fr; 2020 Dec; 91(4):303-321. PubMed ID: 33355535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is there any difference between conventional, passive and active self-ligating brackets? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Maizeray R; Wagner D; Lefebvre F; Lévy-Bénichou H; Bolender Y
Int Orthod; 2021 Dec; 19(4):523-538. PubMed ID: 34629309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of anchorage loss between conventional and self-ligating brackets during canine retraction - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Malik DES; Fida M; Afzal E; Irfan S
Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 31866192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yi J; Li M; Li Y; Li X; Zhao Z
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Nov; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 27871255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review.
Fleming PS; Johal A
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 20050755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic review of self-ligating brackets.
Chen SS; Greenlee GM; Kim JE; Smith CL; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):726.e1-726.e18; discussion 726-7. PubMed ID: 20685517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of orthodontic space closure using micro-osteoperforation and passive self-ligating appliances or conventional fixed appliances.
Mittal R; Attri S; Batra P; Sonar S; Sharma K; Raghavan S
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):634-639. PubMed ID: 33378478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of fixed orthodontic brackets on oral malodor: A systematic review and meta-analysis according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines.
Huang J; Li CY; Jiang JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(14):e0233. PubMed ID: 29620635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing efficiency of sliding mechanics to close extraction space: a systematic review.
Barlow M; Kula K
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 18416747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A "typodont" study of rate of orthodontic space closure: self-ligating systems vs. conventional systems.
Saporito I; Butti AC; Salvato A; Biagi R
Minerva Stomatol; 2011; 60(11-12):555-65. PubMed ID: 22210459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canine retraction and anchorage loss self-ligating versus conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou Q; Ul Haq AA; Tian L; Chen X; Huang K; Zhou Y
BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15(1):136. PubMed ID: 26531223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Therapeutic efficacy of self-ligating brackets: A systematic review.
Dehbi H; Azaroual MF; Zaoui F; Halimi A; Benyahia H
Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 28778722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial.
Al-Ibrahim HM; Hajeer MY; Alkhouri I; Zinah E
J World Fed Orthod; 2022 Feb; 11(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 34688577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No reliable evidence to guide initial arch wire choice for fixed appliance therapy.
Flores-Mir C
Evid Based Dent; 2013 Dec; 14(4):114-5. PubMed ID: 24357824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
