204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101414)
21. Re: Maxillary canine retraction with self-ligating and conventional brackets. A randomized clinical trial. By: Maurı´cio Mezomo; Eduardo S. de Lima; Luciane Macedo de Menezes; Andre’ Weissheimer; Susiane Allgayer. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:292–297.
Nainan O; Mitra R; Chopra SS
Angle Orthod; 2011 Sep; 81(5):926-7; author reply 927. PubMed ID: 21991596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnold S; Koletsi D; Patcas R; Eliades T
J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():13-24. PubMed ID: 27546466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Operating time for wire ligation with self-ligating and conventional brackets: A standardized in vitro study.
Cattaneo PM; Tepedino M; Hansen EB; Gram AR; Cornelis MA
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2022 Dec; 8(6):1456-1466. PubMed ID: 36017763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective clinical study of transverse development with orthodontics with self-ligating brackets.
Mateu ME; Benítez-Rogé S; Calabrese D; Lumi M; Iglesias M; Méndez P; Solla M; Folco AA
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2020 Sep; 33(2):112-116. PubMed ID: 32920613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of mandibular arch changes during alignment and leveling with 2 preadjusted edgewise appliances.
Fleming PS; DiBiase AT; Sarri G; Lee RT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):340-7. PubMed ID: 19732667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review.
Parmar NP; Thompson GL; Atack NE; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M; Haworth JA
J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 34839734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Opal self-ligating brackets with manually ligating brackets.
Deshpande A; Srinivas N; Kumar KK; Mapare S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 23151699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Self-ligation and faster treatment time--a myth?
Kailasam V; Jagdish N; Chitharanjan AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):544. PubMed ID: 25439194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium springs vs elastomeric chains in orthodontic space closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Mohammed H; Rizk MZ; Wafaie K; Almuzian M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2018 Feb; 21(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29265578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.
Čelar A; Schedlberger M; Dörfler P; Bertl M
J Orofac Orthop; 2013 Jan; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 23299650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transversal maxillary dento-alveolar changes in patients treated with active and passive self-ligating brackets: a randomized clinical trial using CBCT-scans and digital models.
Cattaneo PM; Treccani M; Carlsson K; Thorgeirsson T; Myrda A; Cevidanes LH; Melsen B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 22008302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of WALA ridge and dental arch dimensions changes after orthodontic treatment using a passive self-ligating system or conventional fixed appliance.
Esteves T; Salvatore Freitas KM; Vaz de Lima D; Cotrin P; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; De Freitas MR; Gobbi de Oliveira RC
Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31397413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.
Scott P; DiBiase AT; Sherriff M; Cobourne MT
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):470.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18929262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Katsaros C; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Periodontal Health in Patients with Self-Ligating Brackets: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.
Mester A; Onisor F; Mesaros AS
J Clin Med; 2022 May; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 35566696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A segmented appliance for space closure followed by Invisalign and fixed appliances.
Uribe F; Cutrera A; Nanda R
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 22299111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical effects of pre-adjusted edgewise orthodontic brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Papageorgiou SN; Konstantinidis I; Papadopoulou K; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 36(3):350-63. PubMed ID: 24062378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Initial arch wires for alignment of crooked teeth with fixed orthodontic braces.
Wang Y; Jian F; Lai W; Zhao Z; Yang Z; Liao Z; Shi Z; Wu T; Millett DT; McIntyre GT; Hickman J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Apr; (4):CD007859. PubMed ID: 20393961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.
Almeida MR; Futagami C; Conti AC; Oltramari-Navarro PV; Navarro Rde L
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):50-7. PubMed ID: 26154456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
