BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101566)

  • 1. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.
    Martin AN; Berry PS; Friel CM; Hedrick TL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2517-2524. PubMed ID: 29101566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Ricciardi R; Goldstone RN; Francone T; Wszolek M; Auchincloss H; de Groot A; Shih IF; Li Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7549-7560. PubMed ID: 35445834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.
    Martin TD; Lorenz T; Ferraro J; Chagin K; Lampman RM; Emery KL; Zurkan JE; Boyd JL; Montgomery K; Lang RE; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):4019-28. PubMed ID: 26694181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicenter Observational Study Examining the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Within the Virginia Surgical Quality Collaborative in Patients Undergoing Elective Colectomy.
    Hedrick TL; Thiele RH; Hassinger TE; Donovan J; Reines HD; Damico E; Fogel S; Jones JE; Posadas J; Jones RS; Turrentine FE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Oct; 229(4):374-382.e3. PubMed ID: 31108195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.
    Groves DK; Altieri MS; Sullivan B; Yang J; Talamini MA; Pryor AD
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 29980972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery.
    Garfinkle R; Boutros M; Ghitulescu G; Vasilevsky CA; Charlebois P; Liberman S; Stein B; Feldman LS; Lee L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jul; 28(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 29451415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
    Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
    Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary Report on Introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: A Single-Center Experience.
    Cintorino D; Ricotta C; Bonsignore P; Di Francesco F; Li Petri S; Pagano D; Tropea A; Checchini G; Tuzzolino F; Gruttadauria S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1437-1442. PubMed ID: 29733252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.