These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101566)

  • 1. Impact of minimally invasive surgery on short-term outcomes after rectal resection for neoplasm within the setting of an enhanced recovery program.
    Martin AN; Berry PS; Friel CM; Hedrick TL
    Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2517-2524. PubMed ID: 29101566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: An analysis of the Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit (BCCA).
    van Harten MJ; Greenwood EB; Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Hunter RA; Kroon HM; Sammour T
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 32312590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Healthcare Resource Utilization After Surgical Treatment of Cancer: Value of Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Ricciardi R; Goldstone RN; Francone T; Wszolek M; Auchincloss H; de Groot A; Shih IF; Li Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7549-7560. PubMed ID: 35445834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving conventional recovery with enhanced recovery in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
    Khreiss W; Huebner M; Cima RR; Dozois ER; Chua HK; Pemberton JH; Harmsen WS; Larson DW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 May; 57(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 24819094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Newly implemented enhanced recovery pathway positively impacts hospital length of stay.
    Martin TD; Lorenz T; Ferraro J; Chagin K; Lampman RM; Emery KL; Zurkan JE; Boyd JL; Montgomery K; Lang RE; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):4019-28. PubMed ID: 26694181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicenter Observational Study Examining the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery Within the Virginia Surgical Quality Collaborative in Patients Undergoing Elective Colectomy.
    Hedrick TL; Thiele RH; Hassinger TE; Donovan J; Reines HD; Damico E; Fogel S; Jones JE; Posadas J; Jones RS; Turrentine FE
    J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Oct; 229(4):374-382.e3. PubMed ID: 31108195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Presence of an Advanced Gastrointestinal (GI)/Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) Fellowship Program Does Not Impact Short-Term Patient Outcomes Following Fundoplication or Esophagomyotomy.
    Groves DK; Altieri MS; Sullivan B; Yang J; Talamini MA; Pryor AD
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Nov; 22(11):1870-1880. PubMed ID: 29980972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive versus open multivisceral resection for rectal cancer clinically invading adjacent organs: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Abe S; Nozawa H; Sasaki K; Murono K; Emoto S; Yokoyama Y; Matsuzaki H; Nagai Y; Shinagawa T; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Jun; 38(6):3263-3272. PubMed ID: 38658387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive and open radical resection for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes in elderly/frail patients.
    Li R; Zhou J; Zhao S; Sun L; Fu Y; Zhang C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 38466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and Economic Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Open and Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery.
    Garfinkle R; Boutros M; Ghitulescu G; Vasilevsky CA; Charlebois P; Liberman S; Stein B; Feldman LS; Lee L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Jul; 28(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 29451415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Short- and long-term outcome following laparoscopic versus open resection for carcinoma of the rectum in the multimodal setting.
    Kellokumpu IH; Kairaluoma MI; Nuorva KP; Kautiainen HJ; Jantunen IT
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Aug; 55(8):854-63. PubMed ID: 22810470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgery and sphincter preservation in rectal cancer.
    Yeo HL; Abelson JS; Mao J; Cheerharan M; Milsom J; Sedrakyan A
    J Surg Res; 2016 May; 202(2):299-307. PubMed ID: 27229104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
    Law WL; Foo DCC
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preliminary Report on Introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Laparoscopic Rectal Resection: A Single-Center Experience.
    Cintorino D; Ricotta C; Bonsignore P; Di Francesco F; Li Petri S; Pagano D; Tropea A; Checchini G; Tuzzolino F; Gruttadauria S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1437-1442. PubMed ID: 29733252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.