These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101820)

  • 1. Extending the limits of force endurance: Stimulation of the motor or the frontal cortex?
    Radel R; Tempest G; Denis G; Besson P; Zory R
    Cortex; 2017 Dec; 97():96-108. PubMed ID: 29101820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():94-103. PubMed ID: 26892298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas.
    Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Ardolino G; Barbieri S; Priori A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jul; 26(1):242-9. PubMed ID: 17614951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing the role of cognitive inhibition in physical endurance using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation over the prefrontal cortex.
    Denis G; Zory R; Radel R
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102507. PubMed ID: 31394308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation alters elbow flexor muscle recruitment strategies.
    Krishnan C; Ranganathan R; Kantak SS; Dhaher YY; Rymer WZ
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 24582369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corticomotor excitability induced by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with and without non-exhaustive movement.
    Miyaguchi S; Onishi H; Kojima S; Sugawara K; Tsubaki A; Kirimoto H; Tamaki H; Yamamoto N
    Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 1529():83-91. PubMed ID: 23891715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Severe hypoxia affects exercise performance independently of afferent feedback and peripheral fatigue.
    Millet GY; Muthalib M; Jubeau M; Laursen PB; Nosaka K
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Apr; 112(8):1335-44. PubMed ID: 22323647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic spinal cord injury.
    Murray LM; Edwards DJ; Ruffini G; Labar D; Stampas A; Pascual-Leone A; Cortes M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 96(4 Suppl):S114-21. PubMed ID: 25461825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not influence the neural adjustments associated with fatiguing contractions in a hand muscle.
    Abdelmoula A; Baudry S; Duchateau J
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2019 Mar; 119(3):597-609. PubMed ID: 30421008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex on Elbow Flexor Muscle Strength in the Very Old.
    Oki K; Clark LA; Amano S; Clark BC
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2019; 42(4):243-248. PubMed ID: 28906348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors.
    Angius L; Pageaux B; Hopker J; Marcora SM; Mauger AR
    Neuroscience; 2016 Dec; 339():363-375. PubMed ID: 27751960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on prefrontal cortex activation during a neuromuscular fatigue task: an fNIRS study.
    Muthalib M; Kan B; Nosaka K; Perrey S
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 789():73-79. PubMed ID: 23852479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
    Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of fatigue on corticospinal excitability of the human knee extensors.
    Kennedy DS; McNeil CJ; Gandevia SC; Taylor JL
    Exp Physiol; 2016 Dec; 101(12):1552-1564. PubMed ID: 27652591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Motor-unit activity differs with load type during a fatiguing contraction.
    Mottram CJ; Jakobi JM; Semmler JG; Enoka RM
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 93(3):1381-92. PubMed ID: 15483059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancement of Mood but not Performance in Elite Athletes With Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation.
    Valenzuela PL; Amo C; Sánchez-Martínez G; Torrontegi E; Vázquez-Carrión J; Montalvo Z; Lucia A; de la Villa P
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2019 Mar; 14(3):310-316. PubMed ID: 30080428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on perception of effort in an isolated isometric elbow flexion task.
    Lampropoulou SI; Nowicky AV
    Motor Control; 2013 Oct; 17(4):412-26. PubMed ID: 24018733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulation of the motor cortex and corticospinal tract to assess human muscle fatigue.
    Gruet M; Temesi J; Rupp T; Levy P; Millet GY; Verges S
    Neuroscience; 2013 Feb; 231():384-99. PubMed ID: 23131709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of motor cortex stimulation to measure simultaneously the changes in dynamic muscle properties and voluntary activation in human muscles.
    Todd G; Taylor JL; Butler JE; Martin PG; Gorman RB; Gandevia SC
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 May; 102(5):1756-66. PubMed ID: 17218428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on sports performance for two profiles of athletes (power and endurance) (COMPETE): a protocol for a randomised, crossover, double blind, controlled exploratory trial.
    Grandperrin Y; Grosprêtre S; Nicolier M; Gimenez P; Vidal C; Haffen E; Bennabi D
    Trials; 2020 Jun; 21(1):461. PubMed ID: 32493462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.