These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29101998)

  • 21. Noninvasive embryo viability assessment by quantitation of human haptoglobin alpha-1 fragment in the in vitro fertilization culture medium: an additional tool to increase success rate.
    Montskó G; Zrínyi Z; Janáky T; Szabó Z; Várnagy Á; Kovács GL; Bódis J
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Mar; 103(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 25577461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development.
    Simon L; Murphy K; Shamsi MB; Liu L; Emery B; Aston KI; Hotaling J; Carrell DT
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2402-12. PubMed ID: 25205757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Blastocyst development in single medium with or without renewal on day 3: a prospective cohort study on sibling donor oocytes in a time-lapse incubator.
    Costa-Borges N; Bellés M; Meseguer M; Galliano D; Ballesteros A; Calderón G
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):707-713. PubMed ID: 26690010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
    Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal euploid embryo transfer strategy, fresh versus frozen, after preimplantation genetic screening with next generation sequencing: a randomized controlled trial.
    Coates A; Kung A; Mounts E; Hesla J; Bankowski B; Barbieri E; Ata B; Cohen J; Munné S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):723-730.e3. PubMed ID: 28139240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improved implantation rates of day 3 embryo transfers with the use of an automated time-lapse-enabled test to aid in embryo selection.
    Adamson GD; Abusief ME; Palao L; Witmer J; Palao LM; Gvakharia M
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):369-75.e6. PubMed ID: 26604069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do donor oocyte cycles comply with ASRM/SART embryo transfer guidelines? An analysis of 13,393 donor cycles from the SART registry.
    Acharya KS; Keyhan S; Acharya CR; Yeh JS; Provost MP; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 27183048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal polar bodies angle for higher subsequent embryo viability: a pilot study.
    Zhang Q; Guo XM; Li Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):670-675.e2. PubMed ID: 26632209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prevention of in vitro fertilization twins should focus on maximizing single embryo transfer versus twins are an acceptable complication of in vitro fertilization.
    Meldrum DR; Adashi EY; Garzo VG; Gleicher N; Parinaud J; Pinborg A; Van Voorhis B
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):223-229. PubMed ID: 29447664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes.
    Neal SA; Franasiak JM; Forman EJ; Werner MD; Morin SJ; Tao X; Treff NR; Scott RT
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):731-736.e1. PubMed ID: 27939761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos.
    Fragouli E; Alfarawati S; Spath K; Wells D
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 24184690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation into the relationship between the metabolic profile of follicular fluid, oocyte developmental potential, and implantation outcome.
    Wallace M; Cottell E; Gibney MJ; McAuliffe FM; Wingfield M; Brennan L
    Fertil Steril; 2012 May; 97(5):1078-84.e1-8. PubMed ID: 22365382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Introduction: Examining the many potential reasons why euploid blastocysts do not always result in viable pregnancies: part 1.
    Meldrum DR
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):545-547. PubMed ID: 26730497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.
    Barrie A; Homburg R; McDowell G; Brown J; Kingsland C; Troup S
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Mar; 107(3):613-621. PubMed ID: 28069186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does the addition of time-lapse morphokinetics in the selection of embryos for transfer improve pregnancy rates? A randomized controlled trial.
    Goodman LR; Goldberg J; Falcone T; Austin C; Desai N
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Feb; 105(2):275-85.e10. PubMed ID: 26522611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neutral effect of body mass index on implantation rate after frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.
    Insogna IG; Lee MS; Reimers RM; Toth TL
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Nov; 108(5):770-776.e1. PubMed ID: 28985909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors.
    Das M; Holzer HE
    Fertil Steril; 2012 May; 97(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 22425200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of early cleavage patterns of human embryos on subsequent in vitro development and implantation.
    Mizobe Y; Oya N; Iwakiri R; Yoshida N; Sato Y; Miyoshi K; Tokunaga M; Ezono Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):348-353.e2. PubMed ID: 27143517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Embryo selection versus natural selection: how do outcomes of comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts compare with the analysis of products of conception from early pregnancy loss (dilation and curettage) among an assisted reproductive technology population?
    Rodriguez-Purata J; Lee J; Whitehouse M; Moschini RM; Knopman J; Duke M; Sandler B; Copperman A
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Dec; 104(6):1460-66.e1-12. PubMed ID: 26361205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. SARS-CoV-2 vs. human gametes, embryos and cryopreservation.
    Anifandis G; Messini CI; Simopoulou M; Sveronis G; Garas A; Daponte A; Messinis IE
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Aug; 67(4):260-269. PubMed ID: 34060390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.