179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29102539)
1. Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health Care.
Murphy DR; Meyer AND; Vaghani V; Russo E; Sittig DF; Wei L; Wu L; Singh H
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Feb; 15(2):287-295. PubMed ID: 29102539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging Results.
Murphy DR; Meyer AN; Bhise V; Russo E; Sittig DF; Wei L; Wu L; Singh H
Chest; 2016 Sep; 150(3):613-20. PubMed ID: 27178786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis.
Murphy DR; Laxmisan A; Reis BA; Thomas EJ; Esquivel A; Forjuoh SN; Parikh R; Khan MM; Singh H
BMJ Qual Saf; 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 23873756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer.
Murphy DR; Meyer AND; Vaghani V; Russo E; Sittig DF; Wei L; Wu L; Singh H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28804030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings.
Murphy DR; Thomas EJ; Meyer AN; Singh H
Radiology; 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 25961634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linked claims and medical records for cancer case management : evaluation of mammography abnormalities.
Eberl MM; Watroba N; Reinhardt M; Pomerantz J; Serghany J; Broffman G; Fox CH; Mahoney MC; Edge SB
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(3):518-24. PubMed ID: 17577210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer.
Murphy DR; Meyer AN; Vaghani V; Russo E; Sittig DF; Richards KA; Wei L; Wu L; Singh H
Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Mar; 8(1):279-290. PubMed ID: 28326433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism.
Meyer AND; Murphy DR; Al-Mutairi A; Sittig DF; Wei L; Russo E; Singh H
J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759. PubMed ID: 28138875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures.
Brown ML; Houn F; Sickles EA; Kessler LG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1373-7. PubMed ID: 7484568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol?
Buch KA; Qureshi MM; Carpentier B; Cunningham DA; Stone M; Jaffe C; Quinn M; Gonzalez C; LaVoye J; Hines N; Bloch BN
Breast J; 2015; 21(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 25669425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast MRI as an adjunct to mammography: Does it really suffer from low specificity? A retrospective analysis stratified by mammographic BI-RADS classes.
Benndorf M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 20707656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
Raghu M; Durand MA; Andrejeva L; Goehler A; Michalski MH; Geisel JL; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Butler R; Forman HP; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2016 Oct; 281(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 27139264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence and Predictive Value of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Detected on Breast MRI: Correlation with Study Indication.
Chikarmane SA; Tai R; Meyer JE; Giess CS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 27955878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
Carvajal J; Patiño JH
Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers.
Meyer AN; Murphy DR; Singh H
J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 27390378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
