These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29102833)

  • 1. Touch DNA sampling with SceneSafe Fast™ minitapes.
    Stoop B; Defaux PM; Utz S; Zieger M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2017 Nov; 29():68-71. PubMed ID: 29102833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of tapelifting as a collection method for touch DNA.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 24315606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondestructive Biological Evidence Collection with Alternative Swabs and Adhesive Lifters.
    Plaza DT; Mealy JL; Lane JN; Parsons MN; Bathrick AS; Slack DP
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):485-488. PubMed ID: 27404622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-throughput DNA extraction of forensic adhesive tapes.
    Forsberg C; Jansson L; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():158-163. PubMed ID: 27448236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recovery of Trace DNA on Clothing: A Comparison of Mini-tape Lifting and Three Other Forensic Evidence Collection Techniques.
    Hess S; Haas C
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jan; 62(1):187-191. PubMed ID: 27864934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrostatic sampling of trace DNA from clothing.
    Zieger M; Defaux PM; Utz S
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 May; 130(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 26753871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of tape-lifts.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Paul Kirkbride K; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102292. PubMed ID: 32248081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of six adhesive tapes as tape lifts for efficient trace DNA recovery without the transfer of PCR inhibitors.
    Hymus CM; Baxter FO; Ta H; Tran T; de Sousa C; Mountford NS; Tay JW
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2024 Mar; 67():102330. PubMed ID: 37802731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a modified p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde solution for touch DNA analysis and its application to STR analysis.
    Yano R; Shimoda O; Okitsu T; Sakurada M; Ueno Y
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():86-92. PubMed ID: 30391625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of adhesive tape for recovery of DNA from crime scene items.
    Barash M; Reshef A; Brauner P
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jul; 55(4):1058-64. PubMed ID: 20456579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary investigation of differential tapelifting for sampling forensically relevant layered deposits.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Nov; 17(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 26152832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single source DNA profile recovery from single cells isolated from skin and fabric from touch DNA mixtures in mock physical assaults.
    Farash K; Hanson EK; Ballantyne J
    Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):191-199. PubMed ID: 29685301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
    Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Recovery of blood traces with scenesafe FAST tape].
    Keller E; Looser M; Bieri HP; Kübler E; Balitzki B
    Arch Kriminol; 2012; 230(5-6):166-76. PubMed ID: 23367791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of contact force on forensic trace collection efficiency when sampling textiles with adhesive tape.
    Damsteeg-van Berkel S; Beemster F; Dankelman J; Loeve AJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 May; 298():278-283. PubMed ID: 30925346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.