BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103132)

  • 1. Vertically arrayed stimuli and responses: transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to Simon task occurs regardless of response-device orientation.
    Zhong Q; Xiong A; Vu KL; Proctor RW
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):175-185. PubMed ID: 29103132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.
    Conde EF; Fraga-Filho RS; Lameira AP; Mograbi DC; Riggio L; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 233(11):3313-21. PubMed ID: 26265123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to the vertical Simon task generalizes across effectors but not stimulus features.
    Zhong Q; Proctor RW; Xiong A; Vu KL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 32140934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.
    Vu KP; Proctor RW; Urcuioli P
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1146-52. PubMed ID: 14704029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of noncorresponding spatial associations to the auditory Simon task.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 17201566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of the affordance effect through transfer of learning.
    Ottoboni G; Iani C; Tessari A; Rubichi S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2295-302. PubMed ID: 24199755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transfer of learning in choice reactions: The roles of stimulus type, response mode, and set-level compatibility.
    Yamaguchi M; Chen J; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):825-36. PubMed ID: 25758176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unintentional and intentional learning of noncorresponding stimulus-response associations in the Simon task.
    Vu KP
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Feb; 136(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 20605125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer of an implied incompatible spatial mapping to a Simon task.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():81-9. PubMed ID: 26745369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer of orthogonal stimulus-response mappings to an orthogonal Simon task.
    Bae GY; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Apr; 62(4):746-65. PubMed ID: 18780263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of visual stimulus mode on transfer of acquired spatial associations.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Zhang Y; Vu KP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):434-45. PubMed ID: 19271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-modal re-mapping influences the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Zorzi M; Umiltà C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 11958350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing.
    Milanese N; Iani C; Rubichi S
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20381024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simon Says-On the influence of stimulus arrangement, stimulus material and inner speech habits on the Simon effect.
    Gade M; Paelecke M; Rey-Mermet A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1349-1363. PubMed ID: 31750724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.
    Dittrich K; Dolk T; Rothe-Wulf A; Klauer KC; Prinz W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1725-36. PubMed ID: 23896690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions.
    Vu KP
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Sep; 35(6):1463-71. PubMed ID: 18035642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.