These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103343)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of anorectal manometry for fecal incontinence: a meta-analysis.
    Yeap ZH; Simillis C; Qiu S; Ramage L; Kontovounisios C; Tekkis P
    Acta Chir Belg; 2017 Dec; 117(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 29103343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-resolution Anorectal Manometry Measures Are More Accurate Than Conventional Measures in Detecting Anal Hypocontractility in Women With Fecal Incontinence.
    Carrington EV; Knowles CH; Grossi U; Scott SM
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 17(3):477-485.e9. PubMed ID: 29966707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of anorectal manometry in patients with fecal incontinence.
    Pehl C; Seidl H; Scalercio N; Gundling F; Schmidt T; Schepp W; Labermeyer S
    Digestion; 2012; 86(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 22832781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of anorectal manometry to endoanal ultrasound in the evaluation of fecal incontinence.
    Reddymasu SC; Singh S; Waheed S; Oropeza-Vail M; McCallum RW; Olyaee M
    Am J Med Sci; 2009 May; 337(5):336-9. PubMed ID: 19440055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel technique for bedside anorectal manometry in humans.
    Bharucha AE; Stroetz R; Feuerhak K; Szarka LA; Zinsmeister AR
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1504-8. PubMed ID: 26227262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence of double incontinence in patients with fecal incontinence undergoing anorectal manometry and discriminating factors.
    Surmont M; Kindt S
    Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2022; 85(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 35709771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical parameters and symptom severity in males with fecal leakage and incontinence.
    Paramor KA; Ibrahim QI; Sadowski DC
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2014 Mar; 26(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 24329987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Esophageal and anorectal involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic assessment with high resolution manometry.
    Luciano L; Granel B; Bernit E; Harle JR; Baumstarck K; Grimaud JC; Bouvier M; Vitton V
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2016; 34 Suppl 100(5):63-69. PubMed ID: 27243115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective cohort study of phenotypic variation based on an anal sphincter function in adults with fecal incontinence.
    Brochard C; Bouguen G; Bodère A; Ropert A; Mallet AL; Morcet J; Bretagne JF; Siproudhis L
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Oct; 28(10):1554-60. PubMed ID: 27144375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anorectal function evaluation and predictive factors for faecal incontinence in 600 patients.
    Lam TJ; Kuik DJ; Felt-Bersma RJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Feb; 14(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 21689265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The SECCA procedure: a new therapy for treatment of fecal incontinence.
    Efron JE
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 13():107-10. PubMed ID: 15744681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endoflip vs high-definition manometry in the assessment of fecal incontinence: A data-driven unsupervised comparison.
    Zifan A; Sun C; Gourcerol G; Leroi AM; Mittal RK
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2018 Dec; 30(12):e13462. PubMed ID: 30216661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contribution of posture to anorectal manometric measurements: are the measurements in left-lateral position physiologic?
    Thekkinkattil DK; Lim MK; Nicholls MJ; Sagar PM; Finan PJ; Burke DA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2112-9. PubMed ID: 17899280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical, anorectal manometry and surface electromyography in the study of patients with fecal incontinence.
    Muñoz Yagüe T; Alvarez Sánchez V; Ibáñez Pinto A; Solís- Herruzo JA
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2003 Sep; 95(9):635-9, 629-34. PubMed ID: 14738408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence of fecal incontinence and its relationship with urinary incontinence in women living in the community.
    Botlero R; Bell RJ; Urquhart DM; Davis SR
    Menopause; 2011 Jun; 18(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 21358353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Treatment of functional diseases after rectum anal surgery: effectiveness of rehabilitation of the pelvic pavement].
    Corno F; Volpatto S; Borasi A; Barberis A; Mistrangelo M
    Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 19365320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry: does it allow automated analysis of sphincter defects?
    Benezech A; Behr M; Bouvier M; Grimaud JC; Vitton V
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 17(10):O202-7. PubMed ID: 26046765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of anorectal biofeedback in scleroderma patients with fecal incontinence: a case-control study.
    Collins J; Mazor Y; Jones M; Kellow J; Malcolm A
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Dec; 51(12):1433-1438. PubMed ID: 27686130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do endoflip assessments of anal sphincter distensibility provide more information on patients with fecal incontinence than high-resolution anal manometry?
    Gourcerol G; Granier S; Bridoux V; Menard JF; Ducrotté P; Leroi AM
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2016 Mar; 28(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 26670599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of balloon expulsion test and anorectal manometry in patients with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Xu D; Kuang M; Liu Y; Jiang H
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 May; 36(5):534-544. PubMed ID: 38555600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.