These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103367)
1. Survey of risks and benefits communication strategies by research nurses. Nusbaum L; Douglas B; Estrella-Luna N; Paasche-Orlow M; Damus K Nurs Ethics; 2019 May; 26(3):937-950. PubMed ID: 29103367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating nurse understanding and participation in the informed consent process. Axson SA; Giordano NA; Hermann RM; Ulrich CM Nurs Ethics; 2019 Jun; 26(4):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 29157120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol. Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study. Nusbaum L; Douglas B; Damus K; Paasche-Orlow M; Estrella-Luna N Glob Qual Nurs Res; 2017; 4():2333393617732017. PubMed ID: 28975139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Views of research ethics committee members on end-of-participation communications for trial participants who stop taking part: a cross-sectional survey study. Cragg WJ; Bishop L; Gilberts R; Gregg M; Mancini M; de Barros CM Trials; 2024 Sep; 25(1):636. PubMed ID: 39350253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Opportunities to Improve Informed Consent with AHRQ Training Modules. Shoemaker SJ; Brach C; Edwards A; Chitavi SO; Thomas R; Wasserman M Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf; 2018 Jun; 44(6):343-352. PubMed ID: 29793885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentists' perspectives, practices, and factors associated with informed consent process for fixed prosthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study of kampala metropolitan area, Uganda. Ndagire B; Barugahare J; Naidoo S; Nankabirwa J; Nakayaga J; Rwenyonyi CM BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):614. PubMed ID: 38802781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed Consent among Clinical Trial Participants with Different Cancer Diagnoses. Ulrich CM; Ratcliffe SJ; Hochheimer CJ; Zhou Q; Huang L; Gordon T; Knafl K; Richmond T; Schapira MM; Miller V; Mao JJ; Naylor M; Grady C AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2024; 15(3):165-177. PubMed ID: 37921867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria. Marshall PA; Adebamowo CA; Adeyemo AA; Ogundiran TO; Strenski T; Zhou J; Rotimi CN BMC Med Ethics; 2014 May; 15():38. PubMed ID: 24885380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey. Gillies K; Entwistle V; Treweek SP; Fraser C; Williamson PR; Campbell MK Trials; 2015 Oct; 16():484. PubMed ID: 26507504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of the Quality of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials of an Experimental Hookworm Vaccine Conducted in Developed and Developing Countries. Diemert DJ; Lobato L; Styczynski A; Zumer M; Soares A; Gazzinelli MF PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2017 Jan; 11(1):e0005327. PubMed ID: 28114401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized study of multimedia informational aids for research on medical practices: Implications for informed consent. Kraft SA; Constantine M; Magnus D; Porter KM; Lee SS; Green M; Kass NE; Wilfond BS; Cho MK Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 27625314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overcoming barriers to informed consent in neurological research: Perspectives from a national survey. Sankary LR; Zelinsky ME; Ford PJ; Blackstone EC; Fox RJ Res Ethics; 2023 Jan; 19(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 37901309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices. Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving understanding of the informed consent process and document. Meade CD Semin Oncol Nurs; 1999 May; 15(2):124-37. PubMed ID: 10222512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nurses' attitudes toward ethical issues in psychiatric inpatient settings. Eren N Nurs Ethics; 2014 May; 21(3):359-73. PubMed ID: 24091350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiologists' and patients' views about the informed consent process and their understanding of the anticipated treatment benefits of coronary angioplasty: A survey study. Astin F; Stephenson J; Probyn J; Holt J; Marshall K; Conway D Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2020 Mar; 19(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31775522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving patient informed consent for haemophilia gene therapy: the case for change. Woollard L; Gorman R; Rosenfelt DJ Ther Adv Rare Dis; 2021; 2():26330040211047244. PubMed ID: 37181114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Details of risk-benefit communication in informed consent documents for phase I/II trials. Kahrass H; Bossert S; Schürmann C; Strech D Clin Trials; 2021 Feb; 18(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 33231107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]