These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103958)

  • 1. Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis.
    Tricco AC; Zarin W; Ghassemi M; Nincic V; Lillie E; Page MJ; Shamseer L; Antony J; Rios P; Hwee J; Veroniki AA; Moher D; Hartling L; Pham B; Straus SE
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 96():133-142. PubMed ID: 29103958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review.
    Zarin W; Veroniki AA; Nincic V; Vafaei A; Reynen E; Motiwala SS; Antony J; Sullivan SM; Rios P; Daly C; Ewusie J; Petropoulou M; Nikolakopoulou A; Chaimani A; Salanti G; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    BMC Med; 2017 Jan; 15(1):3. PubMed ID: 28052774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological assessment and overall confidence in the results of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Faggion CM; Pulikkotil SJ; Alatta A; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2022 May; 55(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 35080025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of network meta-analyses in anesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-epidemiological study.
    Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
    Can J Anaesth; 2023 Sep; 70(9):1461-1473. PubMed ID: 37420161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of network meta-analyses in Chinese medicine.
    Yang F; Wang H; Zou J; Li X; Jin X; Cao Y; Tian J; Ge L; Lee MS; Zhang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(47):e13052. PubMed ID: 30461607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
    Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
    Tricco AC; Lillie E; Zarin W; O'Brien K; Colquhoun H; Kastner M; Levac D; Ng C; Sharpe JP; Wilson K; Kenny M; Warren R; Wilson C; Stelfox HT; Straus SE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Feb; 16():15. PubMed ID: 26857112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reporting quality of systematic reviews with network meta-analyses in Endodontics.
    Nagendrababu V; Narasimhan S; Faggion CM; Dharmarajan L; Jacob PS; Gopinath VK; Dummer PMH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3437-3445. PubMed ID: 36914841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics and methods of incorporating randomized and nonrandomized evidence in network meta-analyses: a scoping review.
    Zhang K; Arora P; Sati N; Béliveau A; Troke N; Veroniki AA; Rodrigues M; Rios P; Zarin W; Tricco AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():1-10. PubMed ID: 31059803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
    Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does type of funding affect reporting in network meta-analysis? A scoping review of network meta-analyses.
    Veroniki AA; Wong EKC; Lunny C; Martinez Molina JC; Florez ID; Tricco AC; Straus SE
    Syst Rev; 2023 May; 12(1):81. PubMed ID: 37149700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015.
    Petropoulou M; Nikolakopoulou A; Veroniki AA; Rios P; Vafaei A; Zarin W; Giannatsi M; Sullivan S; Tricco AC; Chaimani A; Egger M; Salanti G
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 82():20-28. PubMed ID: 27864068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
    Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
    Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mapping the characteristics, methodological quality and standards of reporting of network meta-analyses on antithrombotic therapies: An overview.
    de Sousa PG; Mainka FF; Tonin FS; Pontarolo R
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 386():125-133. PubMed ID: 37230428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review.
    Tonin FS; Borba HH; Leonart LP; Mendes AM; Steimbach LM; Pontarolo R; Fernandez-Llimos F
    Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 48(2):620-632. PubMed ID: 30212868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology Characteristics, Methodological Assessment and Reporting of Statistical Analysis of Network Meta-Analyses in the Field of Cancer.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li XX; Song F; Li L; Zhang J; Li G; Pei GQ; Qiu X; Yang KH
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37208. PubMed ID: 27848997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping.
    Wang Y; Chen N; Guo K; Li Y; E F; Yang C; Shang X; Li X; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():1-12. PubMed ID: 36351510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.