These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103958)

  • 21. Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping.
    Wang Y; Chen N; Guo K; Li Y; E F; Yang C; Shang X; Li X; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jan; 153():1-12. PubMed ID: 36351510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Ge L; Tian JH; Li YN; Pan JX; Li G; Wei D; Xing X; Pan B; Chen YL; Song FJ; Yang KH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jan; 93():45-55. PubMed ID: 29111471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Network meta-analyses could be improved by searching more sources and by involving a librarian.
    Li L; Tian J; Tian H; Moher D; Liang F; Jiang T; Yao L; Yang K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1001-7. PubMed ID: 24841794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Statistical analyses and quality of individual participant data network meta-analyses were suboptimal: a cross-sectional study.
    Gao Y; Shi S; Li M; Luo X; Liu M; Yang K; Zhang J; Song F; Tian J
    BMC Med; 2020 Jun; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 32475340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review.
    Woo BFY; Tam WWS; Williams MY; Ow Yong JQY; Cheong ZY; Ong YC; Poon SN; Goh YS
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2023 Jul; 55(4):874-885. PubMed ID: 36494752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
    Pham MT; Rajić A; Greig JD; Sargeant JM; Papadopoulos A; McEwen SA
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):371-85. PubMed ID: 26052958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Registration in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) of systematic review protocols was associated with increased review quality.
    Sideri S; Papageorgiou SN; Eliades T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():103-110. PubMed ID: 29339215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.
    Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE
    BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data.
    Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Soobiah C; Elliott MJ; Tricco AC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():47. PubMed ID: 27116943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Knowledge user survey and Delphi process to inform development of a new risk of bias tool to assess systematic reviews with network meta-analysis (RoB NMA tool).
    Lunny C; Veroniki AA; Hutton B; White I; Higgins J; Wright JM; Kim JY; Thirugnanasampanthar SS; Siddiqui S; Watt J; Moja L; Taske N; Lorenz RC; Gerrish S; Straus S; Minogue V; Hu F; Lin K; Kapani A; Nagi S; Chen L; Akbar-Nejad M; Tricco AC
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Feb; 28(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35948412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. State of reporting of primary biomedical research: a scoping review protocol.
    Li G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Jin Y; Nwosu I; Levine MA; Adachi JD; Thabane L
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e014749. PubMed ID: 28360252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(1):117. PubMed ID: 28629396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
    Cortese S; Tomlinson A; Cipriani A
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 58(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 30738544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Methodological review to develop a list of bias items used to assess reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: protocol and rationale.
    Lunny C; Tricco AC; Veroniki AA; Dias S; Hutton B; Salanti G; Wright JM; White I; Whiting P
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jun; 11(6):e045987. PubMed ID: 34168027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Node-making process in network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological treatment are poorly reported.
    James A; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():95-102. PubMed ID: 29196202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A scoping review of rapid review methods.
    Tricco AC; Antony J; Zarin W; Strifler L; Ghassemi M; Ivory J; Perrier L; Hutton B; Moher D; Straus SE
    BMC Med; 2015 Sep; 13():224. PubMed ID: 26377409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.