These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29103958)

  • 41. Epidemiological, methodological, and statistical characteristics of network meta-analysis in anaesthesia: a systematic review.
    Sehmbi H; Retter S; Shah UJ; Nguyen D; Martin J; Uppal V
    Br J Anaesth; 2023 Mar; 130(3):272-286. PubMed ID: 36404140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor.
    Spineli LM; Yepes-Nuñez JJ; Schünemann HJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):115. PubMed ID: 30355280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Nature and reporting characteristics of UK health technology assessment systematic reviews.
    Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):35. PubMed ID: 29739352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Expediting citation screening using PICo-based title-only screening for identifying studies in scoping searches and rapid reviews.
    Rathbone J; Albarqouni L; Bakhit M; Beller E; Byambasuren O; Hoffmann T; Scott AM; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 6(1):233. PubMed ID: 29178925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Quality assessment of systematic reviews for surgical treatment of low back pain: an overview.
    Martins DE; Astur N; Kanas M; Ferretti M; Lenza M; Wajchenberg M
    Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 26826347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions.
    Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Isla-Tejera B; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; Gómez-García F; García-Nieto AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():35-43. PubMed ID: 29803759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Systematic reviews of factors associated with the onset and progression of neurological conditions in humans: A methodological overview.
    Hersi M; Quach P; Wang MD; Gomes J; Gaskin J; Krewski D
    Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jul; 61():12-18. PubMed ID: 27377856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Mapping the characteristics of network meta-analyses on drug therapy: A systematic review.
    Tonin FS; Steimbach LM; Mendes AM; Borba HH; Pontarolo R; Fernandez-Llimos F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196644. PubMed ID: 29709028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Not all systematic reviews are systematic: a meta-review of the quality of systematic reviews for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure.
    Conway A; Inglis SC; Chang AM; Horton-Breshears M; Cleland JG; Clark RA
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Sep; 19(6):326-37. PubMed ID: 24163297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A scoping review found increasing examples of rapid qualitative evidence syntheses and no methodological guidance.
    Campbell F; Weeks L; Booth A; Kaunelis D; Smith A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 115():160-171. PubMed ID: 31229582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.
    Mueller M; D'Addario M; Egger M; Cevallos M; Dekkers O; Mugglin C; Scott P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: A methodological appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bryce S; Sloan E; Lee S; Ponsford J; Rossell S
    J Psychiatr Res; 2016 Apr; 75():91-106. PubMed ID: 26828372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A scoping review of network meta-analyses assessing the efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative medicine interventions.
    Pratt M; Wieland S; Ahmadzai N; Butler C; Wolfe D; Pussagoda K; Skidmore B; Veroniki A; Rios P; Tricco AC; Hutton B
    Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):97. PubMed ID: 32354348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Giannakopoulos NN
    Vet J; 2012 May; 192(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21924652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quality assessment versus risk of bias in systematic reviews: AMSTAR and ROBIS had similar reliability but differed in their construct and applicability.
    Banzi R; Cinquini M; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Pecoraro V; Capobussi M; Minozzi S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():24-32. PubMed ID: 29526556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A descriptive analysis of the characteristics and the peer review process of systematic review protocols published in an open peer review journal from 2012 to 2017.
    Rombey T; Allers K; Mathes T; Hoffmann F; Pieper D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):57. PubMed ID: 30866832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.