151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29104375)
21. Accounting for uncertainty in the quantification of the environmental impacts of Canadian pig farming systems.
Mackenzie SG; Leinonen I; Ferguson N; Kyriazakis I
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):3130-43. PubMed ID: 26115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Life cycle assessment of integrated solid state anaerobic digestion and composting for on-farm organic residues treatment.
Li Y; Manandhar A; Li G; Shah A
Waste Manag; 2018 Jun; 76():294-305. PubMed ID: 29571569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can farmers mitigate environmental impacts through combined production of food, fuel and feed? A consequential life cycle assessment of integrated mixed crop-livestock system with a green biorefinery.
Parajuli R; Dalgaard T; Birkved M
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():127-143. PubMed ID: 29145050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Sustainability of renewable fuel infrastructure: a screening LCA case study of anticorrosive graphene oxide epoxy liners in steel tanks for the storage of biodiesel and its blends.
Chilkoor G; Upadhyayula VK; Gadhamshetty V; Koratkar N; Tysklind M
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Feb; 19(2):141-153. PubMed ID: 28091679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Air treatment technologies in pig farms. Life cycle assessment of dry and wet scrubbers in Northern Italy and Northeastern Spain.
Ruiz-Colmenero M; Costantini M; Bàllega A; Zoli M; Andón M; Cerrillo M; Fàbrega E; Bonmatí A; Guarino M; Bacenetti J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Apr; 922():171197. PubMed ID: 38408674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Environmental impact of heavy pig production in a sample of Italian farms. A cradle to farm-gate analysis.
Pirlo G; Carè S; Casa GD; Marchetti R; Ponzoni G; Faeti V; Fantin V; Masoni P; Buttol P; Zerbinatti L; Falconi F
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Sep; 565():576-585. PubMed ID: 27203518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A systems approach to evaluate nitrogen utilization efficiency and environmental impacts of swine growing-finishing feeding programs in U.S. pork production systems.
Yang Z; Urriola PE; Johnston LJ; Shurson GC
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37279969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Production: Insights From a Systematic Review.
Andretta I; Hickmann FMW; Remus A; Franceschi CH; Mariani AB; Orso C; Kipper M; Létourneau-Montminy MP; Pomar C
Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():750733. PubMed ID: 34778435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors affecting life cycle assessment of milk produced on 6 Mediterranean buffalo farms.
Pirlo G; Carè S; Fantin V; Falconi F; Buttol P; Terzano GM; Masoni P; Pacelli C
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6583-93. PubMed ID: 25129494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from manure.
Krexner T; Bauer A; Zollitsch W; Weiland K; Bismarck A; Mautner A; Medel-Jiménez F; Gronauer A; Kral I
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115093. PubMed ID: 35472838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of nitrate and 3-nitrooxypropanol on the carbon footprints of milk from cattle produced in confined-feeding systems across regions in the United States: A life cycle analysis.
Uddin ME; Tricarico JM; Kebreab E
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5074-5083. PubMed ID: 35346477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Life Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment on Different Modes of Greenhouse Vegetable Production in the North China Plain].
Xu Q; Hu KL; Li J; Han H; Yang HF
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 May; 39(5):2480-2488. PubMed ID: 29965550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of changing toward higher welfare broiler production systems on greenhouse gas emissions: a Dutch case study using life cycle assessment.
Mostert PF; Bos AP; van Harn J; de Jong IC
Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102151. PubMed ID: 36279609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hotspots and bottlenecks for the enhancement of the environmental sustainability of pig systems, with emphasis on European pig systems.
Pexas G; Kyriazakis I
Porcine Health Manag; 2023 Nov; 9(1):53. PubMed ID: 37974286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Dairy Farms Rearing the Italian Simmental Dual-Purpose Breed.
Baldini M; Da Borso F; Rossi A; Taverna M; Bovolenta S; Piasentier E; Corazzin M
Animals (Basel); 2020 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 32069929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Environmental burdens of small-scale intensive pig production in China.
Liu X; Cai Z; Yuan Z
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 770():144720. PubMed ID: 33517013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Animal board invited review: Specialising and intensifying cattle production for better efficiency and less global warming: contrasting results for milk and meat co-production at different scales.
Faverdin P; Guyomard H; Puillet L; Forslund A
Animal; 2022 Jan; 16(1):100431. PubMed ID: 34996025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
