318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107011)
1. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool.
Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1709-1714. PubMed ID: 28328525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient-based quality control for glucometers: using the moving sum of positive patient results and moving average.
Lim CY; Badrick T; Loh TP
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020709. PubMed ID: 32550817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical goals for interference.
Fuentes-Arderiu X; Fraser CG
Ann Clin Biochem; 1991 Jul; 28 ( Pt 4)():393-5. PubMed ID: 1892351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exponentially adjusted moving mean procedure for quality control. An optimized patient sample control procedure.
Smith FA; Kroft SH
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jan; 105(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 8561087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical performance specifications for changes in assay bias (Δbias) for data with logarithmic distributions as assessed by effects on reference change values.
Petersen PH; Lund F; Fraser CG; Sölétormos G
Ann Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 53(6):686-691. PubMed ID: 27147623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of out-of-control situations detected by "average of normal" approach.
Liu J; Tan CH; Loh TP; Badrick T
Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1248-1253. PubMed ID: 27452179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of analytical run length on quality-control (QC) performance and the QC planning process.
Parvin CA; Gronowski AM
Clin Chem; 1997 Nov; 43(11):2149-54. PubMed ID: 9365401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting Statistical Quality Control Procedures for Limiting the Impact of Increases in Analytical Random Error on Patient Safety.
Yago M
Clin Chem; 2017 May; 63(5):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 28302731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Missed detection of significant positive and negative shifts in gentamicin assay: implications for routine laboratory quality practices.
Koerbin G; Liu J; Eigenstetter A; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Feb; 28(1):010705. PubMed ID: 29187798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test result variation and the quality of evidence-based clinical guidelines.
Fraser CG
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 15234632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new concept to derive permissible limits for analytical imprecision and bias considering diagnostic requirements and technical state-of-the-art.
Haeckel R; Wosniok W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Apr; 49(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 21345158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple matrix of analytical performance to identify assays that risk patients using External Quality Assurance Program data.
Mackay M; Hegedus G; Badrick T
Clin Biochem; 2016 May; 49(7-8):596-600. PubMed ID: 26800780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison and optimization of various moving patient-based real-time quality control procedures for serum sodium.
Li Y; Yu Q; Zhang X; Chen X
J Clin Lab Anal; 2021 Oct; 35(10):e23985. PubMed ID: 34520584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the power of quality-control rules to detect persistent increases in random error.
Parvin CA
Clin Chem; 1992 Mar; 38(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 1547553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A note on the use of outlier criteria in Ontario laboratory quality control schemes.
Hayes K; Kinsella A; Coffey N
Clin Biochem; 2007 Feb; 40(3-4):147-52. PubMed ID: 17222814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Setting analytical goals for random analytical error in specific clinical monitoring situations.
Fraser CG; Hyltoft Peterson P; Larsen ML
Clin Chem; 1990 Sep; 36(9):1625-8. PubMed ID: 2208703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of analytical quality specifications based on biological within- and between-subject variation.
Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Jørgensen L; Brandslund I; Stahl M; Gowans E; Libeer JC; Ricós C
Ann Clin Biochem; 2002 Nov; 39(Pt 6):543-50. PubMed ID: 12564835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new quality control method based on a moving average of "latent reference values" selected from patients' daily test results.
Hayashi S; Ichihara K; Kanakura Y; Iwatani Y
Rinsho Byori; 2004 Mar; 52(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 15137317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
