234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107458)
1. Imaging Facilities' Adherence to PI-RADS v2 Minimum Technical Standards for the Performance of Prostate MRI.
Esses SJ; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Acad Radiol; 2018 Feb; 25(2):188-195. PubMed ID: 29107458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.
Coşkun M; Sarp AF; Karasu Ş; Gelal MF; Türkbey B
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2019 Nov; 25(6):421-427. PubMed ID: 31650967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate at 1.5 versus 3.0T: A prospective comparison study of image quality.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Oelers C; Dietzel F; Sawicki LM; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Blondin D; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 May; 90():192-197. PubMed ID: 28583633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol.
Cuocolo R; Stanzione A; Ponsiglione A; Verde F; Ventimiglia A; Romeo V; Petretta M; Imbriaco M
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108662. PubMed ID: 31539790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
Meier-Schroers M; Kukuk G; Wolter K; Decker G; Fischer S; Marx C; Traeber F; Sprinkart AM; Block W; Schild HH; Willinek W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 85(7):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27235878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2): a pictorial review.
Hassanzadeh E; Glazer DI; Dunne RM; Fennessy FM; Harisinghani MG; Tempany CM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jan; 42(1):278-289. PubMed ID: 27522352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional Standardization of Prostate Multiparametric MRI Performance and Reporting: Is There a Role for a Director of Prostate Imaging?
Abreu-Gomez J; Shabana W; McInnes MDF; O'Sullivan JP; Morash C; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):844-850. PubMed ID: 31180739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of different computed high b-values on diffusion weighted imaging scores in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 of prostate cancer in peripheral zone].
Wang W; Shao ZH; Zeng JQ; Wu DL; Wang GL; Wang PJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 97(43):3401-3405. PubMed ID: 29179281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Lanzman RS; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3185-90. PubMed ID: 23756958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.
Curci NE; Lane BR; Shankar PR; Noyes SL; Moriarity AK; Kubat A; Brede C; Montgomery JS; Auffenberg GB; Miller DC; Montie JE; George AK; Davenport MS
Urology; 2018 Jun; 116():137-143. PubMed ID: 29653121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
