These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107757)

  • 1. Ten recommendations for assessing the comparative effectiveness of therapeutic medical devices: a targeted review and adaptation.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Hunger T; Conrads-Frank A; Arvandi M; Siebert U
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():97-113. PubMed ID: 29107757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations for primary studies evaluating therapeutic medical devices were identified and systematically reported through reviewing existing guidance.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Hunger T; Conrads-Frank A; Arvandi M; Siebert U
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 94():46-58. PubMed ID: 29122699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The economic evaluation of medical devices: challenges.
    Kingkaew P; Teerawattananon Y
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S102-7. PubMed ID: 24964706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M;
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():145-152. PubMed ID: 28139086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom.
    Akehurst R
    Value Health; 2010 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():S4-5. PubMed ID: 20618794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT METHODS GUIDELINES FOR MEDICAL DEVICES: HOW CAN WE ADDRESS THE GAPS? THE INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
    Polisena J; Castaldo R; Ciani O; Federici C; Borsci S; Ritrovato M; Clark D; Pecchia L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2018 Jan; 34(3):276-289. PubMed ID: 29909792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of the economic tools for assessing new medical devices.
    Craig JA; Carr L; Hutton J; Glanville J; Iglesias CP; Sims AJ
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2015 Feb; 13(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 25139635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
    Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating health economics modeling in the product development cycle of medical devices: a Bayesian approach.
    Vallejo-Torres L; Steuten LM; Buxton MJ; Girling AJ; Lilford RJ; Young T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 18828941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Medical Devices.
    Tarricone R; Callea G; Ogorevc M; Prevolnik Rupel V
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():70-92. PubMed ID: 28139085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Challenges in the Assessment of Medical Devices: The MedtecHTA Project.
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Drummond M
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():5-12. PubMed ID: 28139084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Generating appropriate clinical data for value assessment of medical devices: what role does regulation play?
    Tarricone R; Torbica A; Ferré F; Drummond M
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2014 Oct; 14(5):707-18. PubMed ID: 25196848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Organisational impact: Definition and assessment methods for medical devices.
    Roussel C; Carbonneil C; Audry A;
    Therapie; 2016 Feb; 71(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 27080633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking the Regulatory and Reimbursement Processes for Medical Devices: The Need for Integrated Assessments.
    Ciani O; Wilcher B; van Giessen A; Taylor RS
    Health Econ; 2017 Feb; 26 Suppl 1():13-29. PubMed ID: 28139087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TAXONOMY OF MEDICAL DEVICES IN THE LOGIC OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT.
    Henschke C; Panteli D; Perleth M; Busse R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(5):324-30. PubMed ID: 26711471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Benefit assessments for medical technology devices: Strategic challenges for clinical research].
    Schönermark MP
    HNO; 2015 Aug; 63(8):586-8. PubMed ID: 26204843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.