173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107843)
1. A comparison of bioinformatic approaches for 16S rRNA gene profiling of food bacterial microbiota.
De Filippis F; Parente E; Zotta T; Ercolini D
Int J Food Microbiol; 2018 Jan; 265():9-17. PubMed ID: 29107843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.
Poirier S; Rué O; Peguilhan R; Coeuret G; Zagorec M; Champomier-Vergès MC; Loux V; Chaillou S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204629. PubMed ID: 30252901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OTUX: V-region specific OTU database for improved 16S rRNA OTU picking and efficient cross-study taxonomic comparison of microbiomes.
Yadav D; Dutta A; Mande SS
DNA Res; 2019 Apr; 26(2):147-156. PubMed ID: 30624596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved OTU-picking using long-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and generic hierarchical clustering.
Franzén O; Hu J; Bao X; Itzkowitz SH; Peter I; Bashir A
Microbiome; 2015 Oct; 3():43. PubMed ID: 26434730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advancing integration of data on food microbiome studies: FoodMicrobionet 3.1, a major upgrade of the FoodMicrobionet database.
Parente E; De Filippis F; Ercolini D; Ricciardi A; Zotta T
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Sep; 305():108249. PubMed ID: 31207407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FoodMicrobionet: A database for the visualisation and exploration of food bacterial communities based on network analysis.
Parente E; Cocolin L; De Filippis F; Zotta T; Ferrocino I; O'Sullivan O; Neviani E; De Angelis M; Cotter PD; Ercolini D
Int J Food Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 219():28-37. PubMed ID: 26704067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OTUs and ASVs Produce Comparable Taxonomic and Diversity from Shrimp Microbiota 16S Profiles Using Tailored Abundance Filters.
García-López R; Cornejo-Granados F; Lopez-Zavala AA; Cota-Huízar A; Sotelo-Mundo RR; Gómez-Gil B; Ochoa-Leyva A
Genes (Basel); 2021 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 33924545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the accuracy of amplicon-based microbiome computational pipelines on simulated human gut microbial communities.
Golob JL; Margolis E; Hoffman NG; Fredricks DN
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):283. PubMed ID: 28558684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decontamination of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence datasets based on bacterial load assessment by qPCR.
Lazarevic V; Gaïa N; Girard M; Schrenzel J
BMC Microbiol; 2016 Apr; 16():73. PubMed ID: 27107811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using Mothur to Determine Bacterial Community Composition and Structure in 16S Ribosomal RNA Datasets.
Chappidi S; Villa EC; Cantarel BL
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 67(1):e83. PubMed ID: 31524992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hybrid-denovo: a de novo OTU-picking pipeline integrating single-end and paired-end 16S sequence tags.
Chen X; Johnson S; Jeraldo P; Wang J; Chia N; Kocher JA; Chen J
Gigascience; 2018 Mar; 7(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 29267858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of high-throughput pyrosequencing in the analysis of microbiota of food commodities procured from small and large retail outlets in a U.S. metropolitan area - A pilot study.
Higgins D; Pal C; Sulaiman IM; Jia C; Zerwekh T; Dowd SE; Banerjee P
Food Res Int; 2018 Mar; 105():29-40. PubMed ID: 29433218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BIOCOM-PIPE: a new user-friendly metabarcoding pipeline for the characterization of microbial diversity from 16S, 18S and 23S rRNA gene amplicons.
Djemiel C; Dequiedt S; Karimi B; Cottin A; Girier T; El Djoudi Y; Wincker P; Lelièvre M; Mondy S; Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré N; Maron PA; Ranjard L; Terrat S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):492. PubMed ID: 33129268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Presence of pathogenic Escherichia coli is correlated with bacterial community diversity and composition on pre-harvest cattle hides.
Chopyk J; Moore RM; DiSpirito Z; Stromberg ZR; Lewis GL; Renter DG; Cernicchiaro N; Moxley RA; Wommack KE
Microbiome; 2016 Mar; 4():9. PubMed ID: 27000779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
