These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107949)

  • 1. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush.
    Undurraga M; Catarino R; Navarria I; Ibrahim Y; Puget E; Royannez Drevard I; Pache JC; Tille JC; Petignat P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0186812. PubMed ID: 29107949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endocervical sampling using brush versus curette: a single centre experience and literature review.
    Mitric C; Lakabi R; Kligun G; Matanes E; Lau S; Gotlieb WH; Salvador S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Dec; 43(1):2162866. PubMed ID: 36689210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
    Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lack of Agreement Between Endocervical Brush and Endocervical Curettage in Women Undergoing Repeat Endocervical Sampling.
    Doo DW; Stickrath EH; Mazzoni SE; Alston MJ
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 27518843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the use of the endocervical brush after endocervical curettage.
    Tate KM; Strickland JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):715-7. PubMed ID: 9351750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the cervical canal with the endocervical brush.
    Hoffman MS; Sterghos S; Gordy LW; Gunasekaran S; Cavanagh D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):573-7. PubMed ID: 8377985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endocervical brush cytology. An alternative to endocervical curettage?
    Weitzman GA; Korhonen MO; Reeves KO; Irwin JF; Carter TS; Kaufman RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Aug; 33(8):677-83. PubMed ID: 3172071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing endocervical curettage and endocervical brush at colposcopy.
    Dunn TS; Stevens-Simon C; Moeller LD; Miekle S
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 25950892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of endocervical curettage and endocervical brushing.
    Klam S; Arseneau J; Mansour N; Franco E; Ferenczy A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 96(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 10862849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears.
    Pretorius RG; Sadeghi M; Fotheringham N; Semrad N; Watring WG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Pap smear quality with anatomical spatula and convenience (spatula-cytobrush) methods: a single blind clinical trial.
    Abdali K; Soleimani M; Khajehei M; Tabatabaee HR; Komar PV; Montazer NR
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(6):1769-72. PubMed ID: 21338231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component.
    Selvaggi SM; Guidos BJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Jul; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10907927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Sampling Devices for Endocervical Curetting.
    Adepiti CA; Ajenifuja KO
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2023 Oct; 73(Suppl 1):130-134. PubMed ID: 37916025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the endocervical brush and the endocervical curettage for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
    Martin D; Umpierre SA; Villamarzo G; Sánchez O; Sánchez J; Carrodeguas J; Adamsons K
    P R Health Sci J; 1995 Sep; 14(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 8588020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving the Cytobrush as an aid in the evaluation of the abnormal Papanicolaou test.
    Gosewehr JA; Julian TM; O'Connell BJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):440-3. PubMed ID: 1876381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush.
    Partoll LM; Javaheri G
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.