These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29107949)

  • 21. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
    Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endocervical curettage as a routine part of colposcopic examinations for abnormal cervical cytology.
    Saltzman DH; Evans MI; Warsof SL; Friedman AJ
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Nov; 30(11):871-3. PubMed ID: 4078822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The screening Papanicolaou smear: contribution of the endocervical brush.
    Taylor PT; Andersen WA; Barber SR; Covell JL; Smith EB; Underwood PB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 3658282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cytological screening--the technique of cytological specimen taking and its influence on the quality of the method].
    Ivanov S
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 18642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.
    Trimbos JB; Arentz NP
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The utility of endocervical curettage: does routine ECC at the time of colposcopy for low-grade cytologic abnormalities improve diagnosis of high-grade disease?
    Rose JD; Byun SY; Sims SM; Davis JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):530.e1-3. PubMed ID: 22541611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical cytology with the Papette sampler.
    Ferenczy A; Robitaille J; Guralnick M; Shatz R
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Apr; 39(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 8040849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Cytobrush quality assurance in endocervical smears].
    Kerl J; Ross A; Hilgarth M
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Jan; 51(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 2026300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears.
    Hoffman MS; Hill DA; Gordy LW; Lane J; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality.
    Murata PJ; Johnson RA; McNicoll KE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the three most common Papanicolaou smear collection techniques.
    Germain M; Heaton R; Erickson D; Henry M; Nash J; O'Connor D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 8041524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Clinical significance of endocervical curettage (ECC) in predicting neoplastic lesions of the cervix].
    Toki T; Fujii S; Yajima A
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Mar; 46(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8133138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Microcolposcopy vs. cone histology in evaluation of the endocervix in women with inadequate colposcopy or positive endocervical curettage.
    Hunter V; Tseng P
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):625-8. PubMed ID: 2810245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
    Kivlahan C; Ingram E
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.