These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29108400)

  • 1. Early experience and favorable clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease in Korea.
    Kwon O; Ahn JM; Kang DY; Kang SH; Lee PH; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Park DW; Park SJ
    Korean J Intern Med; 2018 Sep; 33(5):922-932. PubMed ID: 29108400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.
    Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid strategy with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds and drug eluting stents for treating complex coronary lesions.
    Jabbour RJ; Ielasi A; Tanaka A; Leoncini M; Cortese B; Grigis G; Mitomo S; Regazzoli D; Di Palma G; Rapetto C; Tespili M; Colombo A; Latib A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(5S1):S4-S9. PubMed ID: 28314675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.
    Mahmoud AN; Barakat AF; Elgendy AY; Schneibel E; Mentias A; Abuzaid A; Elgendy IY
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 28468954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mid-term clinical outcomes of ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting stent for coronary bifurcation lesions.
    Naganuma T; Kawamoto H; Panoulas VF; Latib A; Tanaka A; Mitomo S; Ruparelia N; Jabbour RJ; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Montorfano M; Colombo A
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 246():26-31. PubMed ID: 28867010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Head-to-head comparison of the neointimal response between metallic and bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds using optical coherence tomography.
    Gomez-Lara J; Brugaletta S; Farooq V; Onuma Y; Diletti R; Windecker S; Thuesen L; McClean D; Koolen J; Whitbourn R; Dudek D; Smits PC; Chevalier B; Regar E; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Ormiston JA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Dec; 4(12):1271-80. PubMed ID: 22192368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraindividual Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Drug-Eluting Metallic Stents.
    Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Wiebe J; Colleran R; Giacoppo D; Harada Y; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Fusaro M; Kastrati A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 27512088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.
    Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus everolimus-eluting metallic stent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 1-year results of a propensity score matching comparison: the BVS-EXAMINATION Study (bioresorbable vascular scaffold-a clinical evaluation of everolimus eluting coronary stents in the treatment of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).
    Brugaletta S; Gori T; Low AF; Tousek P; Pinar E; Gomez-Lara J; Scalone G; Schulz E; Chan MY; Kocka V; Hurtado J; Gomez-Hospital JA; Münzel T; Lee CH; Cequier A; Valdés M; Widimsky P; Serruys PW; Sabaté M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt B):189-197. PubMed ID: 25616924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Procedural resources utilization and clinical outcomes with bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffolds and Pt-Cr everolimus-eluting stent with resorbable abluminal polymer in clinical practice. A randomized trial.
    de la Torre Hernandez JM; Garcia Camarero T; Lee DH; Sainz Laso F; Veiga Fernandez G; Pino T; Rubio S; Legarra P; Valdivia JR; Zueco Gil J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 90(2):E25-E30. PubMed ID: 27807948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design.
    Diletti R; Serruys PW; Farooq V; Sudhir K; Dorange C; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Chevalier B
    Am Heart J; 2012 Nov; 164(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 23137495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcome of everolimus eluting bioabsorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) compared to non BVS drug eluting stent in the management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) - A comparative study.
    Chakraborty R; Patra S; Banerjee S; Pande A; Khan A; Mandol PC; Ghosh D; De SK; Das SS; Nag R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 26905052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arterial healing following primary PCI using the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb BVS) versus the durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent (XIENCE) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the randomised TROFI II study.
    Räber L; Onuma Y; Brugaletta S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Backx B; Iñiguez A; Okkels Jensen L; Cequier-Fillat À; Pilgrim T; Christiansen EH; Hofma SH; Suttorp M; Serruys PW; Sabaté M; Windecker S
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Jul; 12(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 26342471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incidence and short-term clinical outcomes of small side branch occlusion after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an interim report of 435 patients in the ABSORB-EXTEND single-arm trial in comparison with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in the SPIRIT first and II trials.
    Muramatsu T; Onuma Y; García-García HM; Farooq V; Bourantas CV; Morel MA; Li X; Veldhof S; Bartorelli A; Whitbourn R; Abizaid A; Serruys PW;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 23517836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical properties of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to the metallic everolimus-eluting stent.
    Dalos D; Gangl C; Roth C; Krenn L; Scherzer S; Vertesich M; Lang I; Maurer G; Neunteufl T; Berger R; Delle-Karth G
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 May; 16():104. PubMed ID: 27225486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.
    Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S
    Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial.
    Serruys PW; Chevalier B; Dudek D; Cequier A; Carrié D; Iniguez A; Dominici M; van der Schaaf RJ; Haude M; Wasungu L; Veldhof S; Peng L; Staehr P; Grundeken MJ; Ishibashi Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Onuma Y
    Lancet; 2015 Jan; 385(9962):43-54. PubMed ID: 25230593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angiographic and optical coherence tomography insights into bioresorbable scaffold thrombosis: single-center experience.
    Karanasos A; Van Mieghem N; van Ditzhuijzen N; Felix C; Daemen J; Autar A; Onuma Y; Kurata M; Diletti R; Valgimigli M; Kauer F; van Beusekom H; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; van Geuns RJ; Regar E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25969547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Technique on Outcomes Following Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation: Analysis From the ABSORB Trials.
    Stone GW; Abizaid A; Onuma Y; Seth A; Gao R; Ormiston J; Kimura T; Chevalier B; Ben-Yehuda O; Dressler O; McAndrew T; Ellis SG; Kereiakes DJ; Serruys PW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(23):2863-2874. PubMed ID: 29100704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vascular response and healing profile of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for percutaneous treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions: A one-year optical coherence tomography analysis from the GHOST-CTO registry.
    La Manna A; Miccichè E; D'Agosta G; Tensol Rodrigues Pereira G; Attizzani GF; Capranzano P; Capodanno D; Tamburino C
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Feb; 253():45-49. PubMed ID: 29137819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.