These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 291092)

  • 21. Durability and indications of amalgam restorations.
    Vrijfoef MM; Spanauf AY; Vermeulen AH; Favero GA; Cordioli GP; Favero L
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1982 Dec; 1(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 6964567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro evaluation of micromarginal leakage of three filling systems--an autoradiographic analysis using radio isotope S35 as a tracer.
    Mohandas U; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1993 Mar; 11(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8040699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Microleakage of a consolidated silver direct filling material.
    Eichmiller FC; Giuseppetti AA; Hoffman KM; Brajdic DR; Miksch V; Delorey-Lytle JA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 10530278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Factors affecting the marginal leakage of amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Nelson LW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 Jan; 108(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6582114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical evaluation of composite resin and amalgam posterior restorations: three year results.
    Derkson GD; Richardson AS; Waldman R
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 Jun; 50(6):478-80. PubMed ID: 6378338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Effect of surface treatment and thermal stress on the adaptation of Germadent amalgam fillings].
    Weiland M; Ullrich B; Borrmann S
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1989; 77(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 2526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM; Moore BK; Rhodes B; Swartz M
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Goodbye amalgam, hello alternatives?
    Williams P
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1996 Feb; 62(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 8820166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Release of mercury vapor from dental amalgam.
    Berglund A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992; 85():1-52. PubMed ID: 1475757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.