162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29110172)
1. When Doctors and Parents Don't Agree: The story of Charlie Gard.
Hammond-Browning N
J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Dec; 14(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 29110172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hard lessons: learning from the Charlie Gard case.
Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):438-442. PubMed ID: 28768716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Who Knows Best (Interests)? The Case of Charlie Gard.
Cave E; Nottingham E
Med Law Rev; 2018 Aug; 26(3):500-513. PubMed ID: 29253235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaches to parental demand for non-established medical treatment: reflections on the Charlie Gard case.
Paris JJ; Cummings BM; Moreland MP; Batten JN
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):443-447. PubMed ID: 29776977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Charlie Gard and the limits of medicine.
The Lancet
Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10094):531. PubMed ID: 28792383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment.
Birchley G
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):448-452. PubMed ID: 29773611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Law, ethics, and emotion: the Charlie Gard case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2017 Jul; 358():j3152. PubMed ID: 28676496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Charlie Gard: in defence of the law.
Close E; Willmott L; White BP
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):476-480. PubMed ID: 29724811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why Charlie Gard's parents should have been the decision-makers about their son's best interests.
Gillon R
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):462-465. PubMed ID: 29724808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Charlie Gard and the Limits of Best Interests.
Shah SK; Rosenberg AR; Diekema DS
JAMA Pediatr; 2017 Oct; 171(10):937-938. PubMed ID: 28800374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guest editorial: Charlie Gard's five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes.
Pope TM
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):436-437. PubMed ID: 29945990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinic, courtroom or (specialist) committee: in the best interests of the critically Ill child?
Huxtable R
J Med Ethics; 2018 Jul; 44(7):471-475. PubMed ID: 29880659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alfie Evans and Charlie Gard-should the law change?
Wilkinson D; Savulescu J
BMJ; 2018 May; 361():k1891. PubMed ID: 29716900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Futility of Treatment for Dying Children: Lessons from the Charlie Gard Case.
Freckelton I
J Law Med; 2017 Nov; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 29978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Terminally ill infants, parents and the courts.
Skene L
Med Law; 2005 Dec; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 16440861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whose interests are they, anyway?
Mohrmann ME
J Relig Ethics; 2006 Mar; 34(1):141-50. PubMed ID: 17144024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Charlie Gard Case, and the Ethics of Obstructing International Transfer of Seriously Ill Children.
Wilkinson D
Pediatrics; 2020 Aug; 146(Suppl 1):S54-S59. PubMed ID: 32737233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study in futility: Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs will not expand access to experimental drugs for the terminally ill.
Ochs A
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2009; 39(2):559-603. PubMed ID: 19462540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Observations on the case of Charlie Gard.
Lagercrantz H
Arch Dis Child; 2018 May; 103(5):409-410. PubMed ID: 29382638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Charlie Gard case: British and American approaches to court resolution of disputes over medical decisions.
Paris JJ; Ahluwalia J; Cummings BM; Moreland MP; Wilkinson DJ
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1268-1271. PubMed ID: 29048408
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
