These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29110209)

  • 41. The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.
    Hourihan KL; Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 27527533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The forward testing effect on self-regulated study time allocation and metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):263-277. PubMed ID: 28333482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Theories of intelligence influence self-regulated study choices and learning.
    Peng Y; Tullis JG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):487-496. PubMed ID: 31282727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.
    Luna K; Martín-Luengo B; Albuquerque PB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1626-1636. PubMed ID: 28856962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The influence of feedback on predictions of future memory performance.
    Sitzman DM; Rhodes MG; Kornell N
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1102-13. PubMed ID: 27245926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The influence of visual mental imagery size on metamemory accuracy in judgment of learning.
    Li T; Hu X; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    Memory; 2017 Feb; 25(2):244-253. PubMed ID: 26957039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Self-regulated learning from illustrated text: Eye movement modelling to support use and regulation of cognitive processes during learning from multimedia.
    Scheiter K; Schubert C; Schüler A
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2018 Mar; 88(1):80-94. PubMed ID: 28782249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis.
    Stiers P; Falbo L; Goulas A; van Gog T; de Bruin A
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():11-23. PubMed ID: 26883066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students With and Without a History of Reading Difficulties.
    Chevalier TM; Parrila R; Ritchie KC; Deacon SH
    J Learn Disabil; 2017 Jan; 50(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26025926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. More than just beliefs: Experience and beliefs jointly contribute to volume effects on metacognitive judgments.
    Frank DJ; Kuhlmann BG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 May; 43(5):680-693. PubMed ID: 27709983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.
    Torres IJ; Mackala SA; Kozicky JM; Yatham LN
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 38(7):730-44. PubMed ID: 27144722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour.
    Doyle ME; Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1197-207. PubMed ID: 26377626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. tDCS over the prefrontal cortex alters objective but not subjective encoding.
    Gaynor AM; Chua EF
    Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 8(3):156-161. PubMed ID: 27417530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Monitoring and depth of strategy use in computer-based learning environments for science and history.
    Deekens VM; Greene JA; Lobczowski NG
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2018 Mar; 88(1):63-79. PubMed ID: 28801957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Performance monitoring for brain-computer-interface actions.
    Schurger A; Gale S; Gozel O; Blanke O
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Feb; 111():44-50. PubMed ID: 27816779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Learning From Surprise: Harnessing a Metacognitive Surprise Signal to Build and Adapt Belief Networks.
    Munnich E; Ranney MA
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):164-177. PubMed ID: 30549202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Control used and control felt: Two sides of the agency coin.
    Potts CA; Carlson RA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2304-2319. PubMed ID: 31165456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Framing effects in value-directed remembering.
    Murphy DH; Knowlton BJ
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Aug; 50(6):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 35488098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Do people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Foster NL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1253-1269. PubMed ID: 28707177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of metacognitive monitoring feedback on performance in a computer-based training simulation.
    Kim JH
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Feb; 67():193-202. PubMed ID: 29122190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.