BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29110272)

  • 1. Impact of County Rurality and Urologist Density on the Practice of Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection and Mortality in Patients Diagnosed with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis.
    Romanelli M; Issa T; Zahnd W; Dynda D; Alanee S
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):334-341. PubMed ID: 29110272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of Urologist Density and County Rurality on the Practice of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection and Cancer-Specific Death in Patients with Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors.
    Clemons J; Zahnd WE; Nutt M; Sadowski D; Dynda D; Alanee S
    J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2017 Mar; 6(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 27409991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer.
    Mao W; Huang X; Kong M; Fan J; Geng J
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Apr; 51(4):641-654. PubMed ID: 30758771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in Survival Associated with Performance of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Penile Cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
    Correa AF; Handorf E; Joshi SS; Geynisman DM; Kutikov A; Chen DY; Uzzo RG; Viterbo R; Greenberg RE; Smaldone MC
    J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 29248557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usage and survival implications of surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes in intermediate- to high-risk, clinical localized penile cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis.
    Woldu SL; Ci B; Hutchinson RC; Krabbe LM; Singla N; Passoni NM; Clinton TN; Raj GV; Miller DS; Sagalowsky AI; Lotan Y; Xie Y; Margulis V; Bagrodia A
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):159.e7-159.e17. PubMed ID: 29288008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disease-specific survival after radical lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: prediction by lymph node count and density.
    Li ZS; Yao K; Chen P; Zou ZJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Zhou FJ; Han H
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):893-900. PubMed ID: 24994488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma.
    Thuret R; Sun M; Lughezzani G; Budaus L; Liberman D; Abdollah F; Morgan M; Johal R; Jeldres C; Latour M; Shariat SF; Iborra F; Guiter J; Patard JJ; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 20839061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ki-67, mini-chromosome maintenance 2 protein (MCM2) and geminin have no independent prognostic relevance for cancer-specific survival in surgically treated squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
    May M; Burger M; Otto W; Hakenberg OW; Wieland WF; May D; Hofstädter F; Götz S; Niessl N; Fritsche HM; Birnkammer K; Gilfrich C; Peter J; Jain A; Koch S; Lebentrau S; Riedmiller H; Rössler W; Denzinger S; Brookman-May S; Gunia S
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E383-90. PubMed ID: 23305250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditional survival of patients with stage I-III squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: temporal changes in cancer-specific mortality.
    Mistretta FA; Palumbo C; Knipper S; Mazzone E; Pecoraro A; Tian Z; Musi G; Perrotte P; Montanari E; Shariat SF; Saad F; Briganti A; de Cobelli O; Karakiewicz PI
    World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):725-732. PubMed ID: 31297629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competing-risks analysis in patients with T1 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
    Thuret R; Sun M; Abdollah F; Budaus L; Shariat SF; Iborra F; Guiter J; Patard JJ; Karakiewicz PI
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4 Pt B):E174-9. PubMed ID: 23057865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A population-based analysis of the effect of marital status on overall and cancer-specific mortality in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.
    Thuret R; Sun M; Budaus L; Abdollah F; Liberman D; Shariat SF; Iborra F; Guiter J; Patard JJ; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI
    Cancer Causes Control; 2013 Jan; 24(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 23109172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is it possible to predict the need of inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis? A clinical and a pathological study.
    Minardi D; Lucarini G; Simonetti O; Di Primio R; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2015 Mar; 87(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25847894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contemporary management of regional nodes in penile cancer-improvement of survival?
    Djajadiningrat RS; Graafland NM; van Werkhoven E; Meinhardt W; Bex A; van der Poel HG; van Boven HH; Valdés Olmos RA; Horenblas S
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 23917166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Population-based assessment of the number of lymph nodes removed in the treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma.
    Zhu Y; Gu CY; Ye DW
    Urol Int; 2014; 92(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 24246932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Penile carcinoma (pT1 G2): surveillance or inguinal lymph node dissection?
    Naumann CM; Filippow N; Seif C; van der Horst C; Roelver L; Braun PM; Juenemann KP; Portillo FJ
    Onkologie; 2005 Mar; 28(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 15772463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
    Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
    J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of delay in inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with carcinoma of penis.
    Gulia AK; Mandhani A; Muruganandham K; Kapoor R; Ansari MS; Srivastava A
    Indian J Cancer; 2009; 46(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 19574673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying an optimal lymph node yield for penile squamous cell carcinoma: prognostic impact of surgical dissection.
    Chipollini J; Azizi M; Lo Vullo S; Mariani L; Zhu Y; Ye DW; Ornellas AA; Watkin N; Ager M; Hakenberg O; Heidenreich A; Raggi D; Catanzaro M; Ornellas P; Salvioni R; Cheriyan SK; Necchi A; Spiess PE
    BJU Int; 2020 Jan; 125(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 31356716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of inguinal lymph node dissection in men with urethral squamous cell carcinoma.
    Werntz RP; Riedinger CB; Fantus RJ; Smith ZL; Packiam VT; Adamsky MA; Smith N; Steinberg GD
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):526.e1-526.e6. PubMed ID: 30446445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extensive inguinal lymphadenectomy improves overall 5-year survival in penile cancer patients: results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.
    Johnson TV; Hsiao W; Delman KA; Jani AB; Brawley OW; Master VA
    Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(12):2960-6. PubMed ID: 20564401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.