These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29110948)

  • 1. Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: Revisiting prosthesis choice in patients younger than 50 years old.
    Schnittman SR; Adams DH; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 155(2):539-547.e9. PubMed ID: 29110948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Survival and long-term outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chiang YP; Chikwe J; Moskowitz AJ; Itagaki S; Adams DH; Egorova NN
    JAMA; 2014 Oct; 312(13):1323-9. PubMed ID: 25268439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y; Chen S; Shi J; Li G; Dong N
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Late outcomes comparison of nonelderly patients with stented bioprosthetic and mechanical valves in the aortic position: a propensity-matched analysis.
    McClure RS; McGurk S; Cevasco M; Maloney A; Gosev I; Wiegerinck EM; Salvio G; Tokmaji G; Borstlap W; Nauta F; Cohn LH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Nov; 148(5):1931-9. PubMed ID: 24521965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements.
    Isaacs AJ; Shuhaiber J; Salemi A; Isom OW; Sedrakyan A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 May; 149(5):1262-9.e3. PubMed ID: 25791947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 55 to 65 Years.
    Alex S; Hiebert B; Arora R; Menkis A; Shah P
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jun; 66(4):313-321. PubMed ID: 28511244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bioprosthetic Versus Mechanical Valve Replacement for Infective Endocarditis: Focus on Recurrence Rates.
    Toyoda N; Itagaki S; Tannous H; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Jul; 106(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 29452115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survival and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement in patients aged 18 to 50 years.
    Schnittman SR; Itagaki S; Toyoda N; Adams DH; Egorova NN; Chikwe J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 155(1):96-102.e11. PubMed ID: 28942968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonelderly Adults: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, Microsimulation.
    Etnel JRG; Huygens SA; Grashuis P; Pekbay B; Papageorgiou G; Roos Hesselink JW; Bogers AJJC; Takkenberg JJM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e005481. PubMed ID: 30760011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection of prosthetic aortic valve and root replacement in patients younger than age 30 years.
    Milewski RK; Habertheuer A; Bavaria JE; Fuller S; Desai ND; Szeto WY; Korutla V; Vallabhajosyula P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Feb; 157(2):714-725. PubMed ID: 30669231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival and outcomes following bioprosthetic vs mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years.
    Chikwe J; Chiang YP; Egorova NN; Itagaki S; Adams DH
    JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(14):1435-42. PubMed ID: 25871669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
    Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Aged 50 Years and Younger.
    Hirji SA; Kolkailah AA; Ramirez-Del Val F; Lee J; McGurk S; Pelletier M; Singh S; Mallidi HR; Aranki S; Shekar P; Kaneko T
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2018 Oct; 106(4):1113-1120. PubMed ID: 29966596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of warfarin on cardiac and cerebrovascular events following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A nationwide cohort study.
    Chang WT; Ho CH; Chang CL; Cheng BC; Wu NC; Chen ZC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 May; 159(5):1730-1739.e1. PubMed ID: 31208804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Similar long-term survival after isolated bioprosthetic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: A propensity-matched analysis.
    Attia T; Yang Y; Svensson LG; Toth AJ; Rajeswaran J; Blackstone EH; Johnston DR;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Nov; 164(5):1444-1455.e4. PubMed ID: 33892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical versus biological valve prosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with infective endocarditis.
    Kytö V; Ahtela E; Sipilä J; Rautava P; Gunn J
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2019 Sep; 29(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31121026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in younger patients: A multicenter analysis.
    Iribarne A; Leavitt BJ; Robich MP; Sardella GL; Gelb DJ; Baribeau YR; McCullough JN; Weldner PW; Clough RA; Ross CS; Malenka DJ; DiScipio AW;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Dec; 158(6):1529-1538.e2. PubMed ID: 30929984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.