These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29111339)

  • 1. Combined Vocal Exercises for Rehabilitation After Supracricoid Laryngectomy: Evaluation of Different Execution Times.
    Silveira HSL; Simões-Zenari M; Kulcsar MA; Cernea CR; Nemr K
    J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):723-728. PubMed ID: 29111339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison and evolution of perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy.
    Crevier-Buchman L; Laccourreye O; Wuyts FL; Monfrais-Pfauwadel MC; Pillot C; Brasnu D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Jul; 118(4):594-9. PubMed ID: 9726689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional outcomes after supracricoid laryngectomy.
    Zacharek MA; Pasha R; Meleca RJ; Dworkin JP; Stachler RJ; Jacobs JR; Marks SC; Garfield I
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Sep; 111(9):1558-64. PubMed ID: 11568604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Objective assessment of the respiratory function of the larynx after fronto-lateral laryngectomy with epiglottoplasty and after supracricoid laryngectomy with CHP or CHEP].
    Matyja G; Zietek E; Kawczyński M; Firlit K; Tarnowska C
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 16989450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
    Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term changes in vocal function after supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy for laryngeal cancer.
    Miyamaru S; Minoda R; Kodama N
    Head Neck; 2019 Jan; 41(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 30548357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice outcome in patients treated for laryngeal cancer: efficacy of voice rehabilitation.
    Tuomi L; Björkner E; Finizia C
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23769005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acoustic Characteristics of Voice Before and After Endoscopic Partial Laryngectomy in Early Glottic Cancer.
    Chotigavanich C; Dowdall JR; Franco RA
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 26846542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic intelligibility assessment of speakers after laryngeal cancer by means of acoustic modeling.
    Bocklet T; Riedhammer K; Nöth E; Eysholdt U; Haderlein T
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):390-7. PubMed ID: 21820272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Computerized evaluation of acoustic parameters of voice and speech after partial supracricoid laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy].
    Crevier-Buchman L; Laccourreye O; Monfrais-Pfauwadel MC; Menard M; Jouffre V; Brasnu D
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(7):397-401. PubMed ID: 7645890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laryngostroboscopic evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    J Voice; 2007 Jul; 21(4):508-15. PubMed ID: 16626933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; Barbotte E; Giovanni A; Guerrier B
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Mar; 115(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 15744175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Communication adjustment of patients with a laryngectomy in Turkey: analysis by type of surgery and mode of speech.
    Evitts PM; Kasapoglu F; Demirci U; Miller JS
    Psychol Health Med; 2011 Dec; 16(6):650-60. PubMed ID: 21749223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality of life evaluation after total laryngectomy: interests and limits in speech therapy].
    Delahaye R; Tessier Ch
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2007; 128(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 20387378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The voice handicap index with post-laryngectomy male voices.
    Evans E; Carding P; Drinnan M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2009; 44(5):575-86. PubMed ID: 19565394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voice handicap evaluation after supracricoid partial laryngectomy.
    Makeieff M; de la Breteque A; Guerrier B; Giovanni A
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Apr; 119(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 19205015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of voice rehabilitation on vocalisation in postlaryngectomy patients: a systematic review.
    Xi S
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2010 Dec; 8(4):256-8. PubMed ID: 21091891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Performance Time of the Semi-Occluded Vocal Tract Exercises in Dysphonic Children.
    Ramos LA; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 27658337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma.
    Dworkin JP; Meleca RJ; Zacharek MA; Stachler RJ; Pasha R; Abkarian GG; Culatta RA; Jacobs JR
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Oct; 129(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 14574283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.