These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29111454)

  • 1. The application of reward learning in the real world: Changes in the reward positivity amplitude reflect learning in a medical education context.
    Williams CC; Hecker KG; Paget MK; Coderre SP; Burak KW; Wright B; Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):236-242. PubMed ID: 29111454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations.
    Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):175-183. PubMed ID: 29154804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedback information and the reward positivity.
    Cockburn J; Holroyd CB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):243-251. PubMed ID: 29208491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feedback delay impaired reinforcement learning: Principal components analysis of Reward Positivity.
    Yin H; Wang Y; Zhang X; Li P
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Oct; 685():179-184. PubMed ID: 30170042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How we learn to make decisions: rapid propagation of reinforcement learning prediction errors in humans.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Handy TC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 26(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 24168216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When theory and biology differ: The relationship between reward prediction errors and expectancy.
    Williams CC; Hassall CD; Trska R; Holroyd CB; Krigolson OE
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Oct; 129():265-272. PubMed ID: 28923360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ERP, frequency, and time-frequency correlates of feedback processing: Insights from a large sample study.
    Williams CC; Ferguson TD; Hassall CD; Abimbola W; Krigolson OE
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Feb; 58(2):e13722. PubMed ID: 33169842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological responses of medial prefrontal cortex to feedback at different levels of hierarchy.
    Shahnazian D; Shulver K; Holroyd CB
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():121-131. PubMed ID: 30081194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reward positivity: Reward prediction error or salience prediction error?
    Heydari S; Holroyd CB
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1185-92. PubMed ID: 27184070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feedback-related negativity reflects omission of monetary gains: Evidence from ERP gambling study.
    Yaple Z; Shestakova A; Klucharev V
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Nov; 686():145-149. PubMed ID: 30195974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The better, the bigger: The effect of graded positive performance feedback on the reward positivity.
    Frömer R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():61-8. PubMed ID: 26756995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. System justification and electrophysiological responses to feedback: support for a positivity bias.
    Tritt SM; Page-Gould E; Peterson JB; Inzlicht M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1004-10. PubMed ID: 24274321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sweetness of successful goal pursuit: Approach-motivated pregoal states enhance the reward positivity during goal pursuit.
    Threadgill AH; Gable PA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):277-286. PubMed ID: 29274365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The electrocortical response to rewarding and aversive feedback: The reward positivity does not reflect salience in simple gambling tasks.
    Mulligan EM; Hajcak G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):262-267. PubMed ID: 29183793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of wellness on neural learning systems.
    Colino FL; Williams CC; Hassall CD; Binsted G; Krigolson OE
    Neurosci Lett; 2020 Jan; 714():134537. PubMed ID: 31605773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations.
    Bellebaum C; Polezzi D; Daum I
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3343-50. PubMed ID: 20655319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychometric properties of neural responses to monetary and social rewards across development.
    Ethridge P; Weinberg A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):311-322. PubMed ID: 29402529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.