These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29111598)
1. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and digital caliper in frozen canine corneas. Jeong S; Kang S; Park S; Park E; Lim J; Nam T; Seo K Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):339-346. PubMed ID: 29111598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Canine central corneal thickness measurements via Pentacam-HR Wolfel AE; Pederson SL; Cleymaet AM; Hess AM; Freeman KS Vet Ophthalmol; 2018 Jul; 21(4):362-370. PubMed ID: 29034562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of central corneal thickness in dogs measured by ultrasound pachymetry and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Martín-Suárez E; Galán A; Morgaz J; Guisado A; Gallardo JM; Gómez-Villamandos RJ Vet J; 2018 Feb; 232():13-14. PubMed ID: 29428083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth of the normal adult horse as measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy. Knickelbein KE; Lassaline ME; Kim S; Scharbrough MS; Thomasy SM Vet Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 25 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):17-24. PubMed ID: 35084084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparability of corneal thickness and opacity depth assessed by OCT and UBM. Garcia PN; Chamon W; Allemann N Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 259(7):1915-1923. PubMed ID: 33763731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Central corneal thickness measurements in normal dogs: a comparison between ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography. Alario AF; Pirie CG Vet Ophthalmol; 2014 May; 17(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 23763504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo evaluation of the cornea and conjunctiva of the normal laboratory beagle using time- and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and ultrasound pachymetry. Strom AR; Cortés DE; Rasmussen CA; Thomasy SM; McIntyre K; Lee SF; Kass PH; Mannis MJ; Murphy CJ Vet Ophthalmol; 2016 Jan; 19(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 25676065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Tam ES; Rootman DS J Cataract Refract Surg; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1179-84. PubMed ID: 12842687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-frequency ultrasound biomicroscopy versus ultrasound and optical pachymetry for the measurement of corneal thickness. Pierro L; Conforto E; Resti AG; Lattanzio R Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212 Suppl 1():1-3. PubMed ID: 9730734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry and Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for measurement of corneal thickness in dogs with and without corneal disease. Hoehn AL; Thomasy SM; Kass PH; Horikawa T; Samuel M; Shull OR; Stewart KA; Murphy CJ Vet J; 2018 Dec; 242():59-66. PubMed ID: 30503546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of Angle Kappa Using Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Corneal Topography. Yeo JH; Moon NJ; Lee JK Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 31(3):257-262. PubMed ID: 28471103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry. Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Graft central thickness measurement by rotating Scheimpflug camera and ultrasound pachymetry after penetrating keratoplasty. de Sanctis U; Missolungi A; Mutani B; Grignolo FM Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1461-8. PubMed ID: 17678690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of central corneal thickness using two immersion ultrasound techniques and optical technique. AlFarhan HM J Pak Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 24864597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography versus ultrasonic pachymetry. Lázaro C; Hernández EM; Martínez D; Redondo P Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2013 Feb; 88(2):45-9. PubMed ID: 23433191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography. Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurement using the Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry]. Hao GS; Zeng L; Li YR; Shui D Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 47(2):142-5. PubMed ID: 21426844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Corneal thickness measurement using Orbscan, Pentacam, Galilei, and ultrasound in normal and post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. Park SH; Choi SK; Lee D; Jun EJ; Kim JH Cornea; 2012 Sep; 31(9):978-82. PubMed ID: 22699561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes. Al-Farhan HM; Al-Otaibi WM Clin Ophthalmol; 2012; 6():1037-43. PubMed ID: 22848145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]