These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29111772)

  • 1. Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment.
    Erdodi LA
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(2):155-172. PubMed ID: 29111772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multivariate Models of Performance Validity: The Erdodi Index Captures the Dual Nature of Non-Credible Responding (Continuous and Categorical).
    Erdodi LA
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1467-1485. PubMed ID: 35757996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five shades of gray: Conceptual and methodological issues around multivariate models of performance validity.
    Erdodi LA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2021; 49(2):179-213. PubMed ID: 34420986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-validation of non-memory-based embedded performance validity tests for detecting invalid performance among patients with and without neurocognitive impairment.
    White DJ; Korinek D; Bernstein MT; Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):459-472. PubMed ID: 32397824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Derivation of a Cross-Domain Embedded Performance Validity Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Whiteside DM; Gaasedelen OJ; Hahn-Ketter AE; Luu H; Miller ML; Persinger V; Rice L; Basso MR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2015; 29(6):788-803. PubMed ID: 26430920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-validation of the Trail Making Test as a non-memory-based embedded performance validity test among veterans with and without cognitive impairment.
    Peak AM; Marceaux JC; Chicota-Carroll C; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 38007610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not so fast! Limitations of processing speed and working memory indices as embedded performance validity tests in a mixed neuropsychiatric sample.
    Ovsiew GP; Resch ZJ; Nayar K; Williams CP; Soble JR
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Jul; 42(5):473-484. PubMed ID: 32498648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Invalid before impaired: an emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators.
    Erdodi LA; Lichtenstein JD
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017; 31(6-7):1029-1046. PubMed ID: 28552028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-validation of three Advanced Clinical Solutions performance validity tests: Examining combinations of measures to maximize classification of invalid performance.
    Bain KM; Soble JR; Webber TA; Messerly JM; Bailey KC; Kirton JW; McCoy KJM
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 30987451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of various WAIS-IV Digit Span indices for identifying noncredible performance validity among cognitively impaired and unimpaired examinees.
    Webber TA; Soble JR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 32(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 29256334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of five performance validity indices in bona fide and simulated traumatic brain injury.
    Bashem JR; Rapport LJ; Miller JB; Hanks RA; Axelrod BN; Millis SR
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(5):851-75. PubMed ID: 24983387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests.
    Critchfield E; Soble JR; Marceaux JC; Bain KM; Chase Bailey K; Webber TA; Alex Alverson W; Messerly J; Andrés González D; O'Rourke JJF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Aug; 33(6):1083-1101. PubMed ID: 30475095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between performance validity testing, external incentives, and cognitive functioning in long COVID.
    Whiteside DM; Basso MR; Shen C; Fry L; Naini S; Waldron EJ; Holker E; Porter J; Eskridge C; Logemann A; Minor GN
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2024 Feb; 46(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 38299800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups.
    Larrabee GJ; Rohling ML; Meyers JE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1354-1372. PubMed ID: 31111775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical utility of embedded performance validity tests on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) following mild traumatic brain injury.
    Lippa SM; Lange RT; Bhagwat A; French LM
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2017; 24(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 27077512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes.
    Schroeder RW; Martin PK; Heinrichs RJ; Baade LE
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Apr; 33(3):466-477. PubMed ID: 29884112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance Validity Classification Accuracy of Single-, Pairwise-, and Triple-Failure Models Using the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery for Adults.
    Silk-Eglit GM; Stenclik JH; Miele AS; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2015; 22(4):271-81. PubMed ID: 25402434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rates of False-Positive Classification Resulting From the Analysis of Additional Embedded Performance Validity Measures.
    Silk-Eglit GM; Stenclik JH; Miele AS; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2015; 22(5):335-47. PubMed ID: 25584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CVLT-II Forced Choice Recognition Trial as an Embedded Validity Indicator: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
    Schwartz ES; Erdodi L; Rodriguez N; Ghosh JJ; Curtain JR; Flashman LA; Roth RM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2016 Sep; 22(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 27619108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical Evaluation Board Involvement, Non-Credible Cognitive Testing, and Emotional Response Bias in Concussed Service Members.
    Mooney SR; Stafford J; Seats E
    Mil Med; 2018 Nov; 183(11-12):e546-e554. PubMed ID: 29590406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.