935 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29112019)
1. Utility of p16 Immunohistochemistry in Evaluating Negative Cervical Biopsies Following High-risk Pap Test Results.
Shain AF; Kwok S; Folkins AK; Kong CS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2018 Jan; 42(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 29112019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential influence of p16 immunohistochemical staining on the diagnosis of squamous cell lesions in cervical biopsy specimens: observation from cytologic-histologic correlation.
Yang J; Elliott A; Hoffa AL; Herring N; Houser PM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Dec; 126(12):1003-1010. PubMed ID: 30307707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression of p16 INK4A in Papanicolaou smears containing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Oct; 91(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 14529682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Significance of p16/Ki-67 double immunocytochemical staining in cervical cytology ASCUS, LSIL, and ASC-H].
Wu Y; Zhao J; Hu J; Wu XW; Zhu LR
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):734-739. PubMed ID: 29179267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. p16 Immunohistochemistry is useful in confirming high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) in women with negative HPV testing.
Zhang G; Yang B; Abdul-Karim FW
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2015 Mar; 34(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 25675189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Results of pap smears and immunocytochemical detection of the p16 and Ki67 proteins in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer].
Rokita W; Skawiński D; Zmelonek-Znamirowska A; Kedzia W; Karowicz-Bilińska A; Spaczyński R; Spaczyński M
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Nov; 83(11):822-6. PubMed ID: 23379189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adjunct p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry aids the detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in endocervical curettage specimens.
Shah AA; Jeffus SK; Zhao Z; Stoler MH; Stelow EB
Am J Clin Pathol; 2014 Mar; 141(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 24515761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. p16 staining has limited value in predicting the outcome of histological low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.
Sagasta A; Castillo P; Saco A; Torné A; Esteve R; Marimon L; Ordi J; Del Pino M
Mod Pathol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 26541274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of p16(INK4a) cytology testing as an adjunct to enhance the diagnostic specificity and accuracy in human papillomavirus-positive women within an organized cervical cancer screening program.
Gustinucci D; Passamonti B; Cesarini E; Butera D; Palmieri EA; Bulletti S; Carlani A; Staiano M; D'Amico MR; D'Angelo V; Di Dato E; Martinelli N; Malaspina M; Spita N; Tintori B; Fulciniti F
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(5):506-14. PubMed ID: 23075891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of P16 expression and Ki-67 proliferation index in ASCUS and ASC-H pap tests.
Toll AD; Kelly D; Maleki Z
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jul; 42(7):576-81. PubMed ID: 24288264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is p16(INK4A) expression more useful than human papillomavirus test to determine the outcome of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance-categorized Pap smear? A comparative analysis using abnormal cervical smears with follow-up biopsies.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Lin YS; Fu E; Gau CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Apr; 97(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15790434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for managing women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology: PALMS study results.
Bergeron C; Ikenberg H; Sideri M; Denton K; Bogers J; Schmidt D; Alameda F; Keller T; Rehm S; Ridder R;
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Jun; 123(6):373-81. PubMed ID: 25891096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of p16(INK4A) immunocytochemistry in "Atypical squamous cells which cannot exclude HSIL" compared with "Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" in liquid-based cervical smears.
Sung CO; Kim SR; Oh YL; Song SY
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Mar; 38(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 19760769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of the Papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Nasser SM; Cibas ES; Crum CP; Faquin WC
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 14579293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overdiagnosis of HSIL on cervical biopsy: errors in p16 immunohistochemistry implementation.
Clark JL; Lu D; Kalir T; Liu Y
Hum Pathol; 2016 Sep; 55():51-6. PubMed ID: 27134110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based cytology--new possibilities in the diagnosis of cervical lesions.
Juric D; Mahovlić V; Rajhvajn S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Skopljanac-Macina L; Barisić A; Projić IS; Babić D; Susa M; Corusić A; Oresković S
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20432728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. p16INK4a immunohistochemical and histopathologic study of Pap test cases interpreted as HSIL without CIN2-3 identification in subsequent cervical specimens.
Solano FJ; Rush DS; Wilkinson EJ
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2015 May; 34(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 25844545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical value of p16
Song FB; Du H; Xiao AM; Wang C; Huang X; Yan PS; Liu ZH; Qu XF; Belinson JEROMEL; Wu RF
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Nov; 55(11):784-790. PubMed ID: 33228350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunohistochemical assessment of p16, COX-2 and EGFR in HPV-positive cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Balan R; Simion N; Giuşcă SE; Grigoraş A; Gheucă-Solovăstru L; Gheorghiţă V; Amălinei C; Căruntu ID
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(4):1187-94. PubMed ID: 22203921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
