189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29112996)
21. New technique for automatic sonographic measurement of change in head-perineum distance and angle of progression during active phase of second stage of labor.
Angeli L; Conversano F; Dall'Asta A; Volpe N; Simone M; Di Pasquo E; Pignatelli D; Schera GBL; Di Paola M; Ricciardi P; Ferretti A; Frusca T; Casciaro S; Ghi T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):597-602. PubMed ID: 31909525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment of the angle of progression and distance perineum-head in the prediction of type of delivery and duration of labor using intrapartum ultrasonography.
Carvalho Neto RH; Viana Junior AB; Moron AF; Araujo Júnior E; Carvalho FHC; Feitosa HN
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jul; 34(14):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31505974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intrapartum ultrasound at the initiation of the active second stage of labor predicts spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Hadad S; Oberman M; Ben-Arie A; Sacagiu M; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100249. PubMed ID: 33451615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In-house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature.
Masturzo B; Piazzese A; Paracchini S; Quezada MS; Todros T; Farina A
Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Feb; 70(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28590104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Gillor M; Vaisbuch E; Zaks S; Barak O; Hagay Z; Levy R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):240-245. PubMed ID: 27062415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.
Katzir T; Brezinov Y; Khairish E; Hadad S; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35576076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.
Popowski T; Porcher R; Fort J; Javoise S; Rozenberg P
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 25583399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive value of head-perineum distance measured at the initiation of the active second stage of labor on the mode of delivery: A prospective cohort study.
Boulmedais M; Monperrus M; Corbel E; Blanc-Petitjean P; Lassel L; Béranger R; Timoh KN; Enderle I; Le Lous M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():132-137. PubMed ID: 36463788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors that affect ultrasound-determined labor progress in women undergoing induction of labor.
Chaemsaithong P; Kwan AHW; Tse WT; Lim WT; Chan WWY; Chong KC; Leung TY; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 220(6):592.e1-592.e15. PubMed ID: 30735668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Traditionally vs sonographically coached pushing in second stage of labor: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Bellussi F; Alcamisi L; Guizzardi G; Parma D; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 29532533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Torkildsen EA; Østborg TB; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 25536955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Uncertain fetal head engagement: a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing digital exam with angle of progression.
Haumonte JB; Blanc J; Castel P; Mace P; Auquier P; d'Ercole C; Bretelle F
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 227(4):625.e1-625.e8. PubMed ID: 35452654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position.
Antonio Sainz J; Borrero C; Aquise A; García-Mejido JA; Gutierrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(20):3400-5. PubMed ID: 26653174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Maroni E; Arcangeli T; De Musso F; Bellussi F; Nanni M; Giorgetta F; Morselli-Labate AM; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Cariello L; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 23288706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of 'angle of progression' in prediction of delivery mode.
Marsoosi V; Pirjani R; Mansouri B; Eslamian L; Jamal A; Heidari R; Rahimi-Foroushani A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1693-9. PubMed ID: 26370603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Relationship between intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurement of angle of progression and head-perineum distance with correlation to conventional clinical parameters of labor progress and time to delivery.
Chan YT; Ng VK; Yung WK; Lo TK; Leung WC; Lau WL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Aug; 28(12):1476-81. PubMed ID: 25163523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.
Sainz JA; Borrero C; Aquise A; Serrano R; Gutiérrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1348-52. PubMed ID: 26037726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound.
Eggebø TM; Wilhelm-Benartzi C; Hassan WA; Usman S; Salvesen KA; Lees CC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 213(3):362.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26008180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
