These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. BETs--should they be published in the journal? Webster AP Emerg Med J; 2004 Jul; 21(4):522-3. PubMed ID: 15208255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. References, reliability and readership. Cooper JE J Small Anim Pract; 2010 Jul; 51(7):359-60. PubMed ID: 20626783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality... in breadth... in depth... and... in demand! Vitiello MV; Krieger J Sleep Med Rev; 2005 Feb; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 15649733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Authors, industry, and review articles. DeMaria AN J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Mar; 43(6):1130-1. PubMed ID: 15028380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The impact factor of medical journals: the judgment of Solomon or the dance of the 7 veils?]. Pocard M Ann Chir; 1998; 52(7):595-7. PubMed ID: 9805794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental and behavioral pediatrics grown up: a new JDBP review series. Stancin T; Wang P; Barbaresi W J Dev Behav Pediatr; 2008 Dec; 29(6):523. PubMed ID: 19077848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Overview and insight]. Haug C Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Nov; 126(21):2783. PubMed ID: 17086214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?]. Antes G; von Elm E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reviewing the correspondence section in the Saudi Medical Journal 2000-2004. Afifi M Saudi Med J; 2006 Jun; 27(6):908-10. PubMed ID: 16758067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement of the reviewing process is the first step for the better journal. Hirose H Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Mar; 52(3):161; author reply 161-2. PubMed ID: 15077854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the quality of systematic reviews in Spinal Cord. Harvey LA Spinal Cord; 2013 Mar; 51(3):174-5. PubMed ID: 23448856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reviewing for journals: ask not what your profession can do for you but what you can do for your profession. Steers WD J Urol; 2006 May; 175(5):1597. PubMed ID: 16600708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part I. Defining the review. Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():679-88. PubMed ID: 15116658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid reviews in The Lancet--and beyond. James A; McNamee D; Horton R Lancet; 2002 Jul; 360(9327):102. PubMed ID: 12126817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. One perspective on the value of journal editorship. Sullivan EV Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Dec; 38(6):728-30. PubMed ID: 25026952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]