These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2911357)

  • 1. Anonymous peer refereeing.
    Nature; 1989 Jan; 337(6204):202. PubMed ID: 2911357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Anonymous but irreplaceable experts in scientific journals].
    Kontula K
    Duodecim; 1993; 109(23-24):2181-3. PubMed ID: 7743970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review unmasked.
    Brunier G
    J CANNT; 1997; 7(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 9362729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing conflicts of interest and clouding of objectivity: BJSM's "peer review: fair review" section.
    Khan KM; Stovitz SD; Pluim B; Cook JL; Bahr R; Arendt EA; Noakes TD
    Br J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 42(2):79. PubMed ID: 18256294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review and refereeing in science.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record.
    Hoppeler H; Handel M; Moulton OC
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Dec; 211(Pt 23):3651. PubMed ID: 19011202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimal refereeing will lead to global equity of information.
    Singer PA
    BMJ; 2001 Jul; 323(7304):111-2. PubMed ID: 11484681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ["Virtual reality" in published sciences?].
    Niethard FU
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1996; 134(6):481-2. PubMed ID: 9027115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maintaining ethical standards in medical publishing.
    Youngs R; Kenyon G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2006 Jan; 120(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 16375774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Bibliometric indicators of the quality of medical scientific research in The Netherlands and Flanders].
    Moed HF; Van Ark GA; van den Berghe H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1995 Jul; 139(29):1483-9. PubMed ID: 7630454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review.
    Nature; 1989 Jun; 339(6224):414. PubMed ID: 2725672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Peer review for the "Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 1994; 46(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 7973139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appetite: peer-reviewed research across the disciplines.
    Booth D
    Appetite; 2008 Sep; 51(2):231-2. PubMed ID: 18455264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Keeping the record straight.
    Shulman A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2001; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14964947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The misused impact factor.
    Simons K
    Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider.
    McKenzie R
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Journal peer review.
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Aug; 313(7):455-6. PubMed ID: 4022077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Reporting guidelines for research: curse or blessing?].
    Ziegler A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2077. PubMed ID: 19802770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.